Search for: "Rose v. Holder" Results 61 - 80 of 188
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Sep 2018, 2:23 am
| Retromark Volume III: the last six months in trade marks | An IPSOC Q&A with Mr Justice Birss | The EU Commission proposes new whistle-blowing rules: should IP and trade secret holders tremble? [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 7:15 am
| Retromark Volume III: the last six months in trade marks | An IPSOC Q&A with Mr Justice Birss | The EU Commission proposes new whistle-blowing rules: should IP and trade secret holders tremble? [read post]
9 Nov 2017, 12:37 pm by Bernie Burk
  For as the Times is now reporting (here), in July of this year Boies’ firm had retained Black Cube on Weinstein’s behalf, hiring them for what the contract Boies signed stated were the “primary objectives” of providing “intelligence which will help the client’s efforts to completely stop the publication of a new negative article in a leading NY Newspaper” (which Farrow identifies as the Times) and obtaining content from a book that was to include… [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 1:19 pm by Andrew Hamm
Ginsburg borrowed from her dissent in Shelby County v. [read post]
26 Feb 2017, 4:00 am by Administrator
Vancouver Community College v. [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 4:30 am by Ben
Well Marie-Andree cited that 1879 case  Feist Publications, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Dec 2016, 4:04 am
That which we call a rose... [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 10:47 am by David Post
Acuff-Rose), “no man but a blockhead ever wrote, except for money. [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 8:51 am by Alexandra Gutierrez
Holder, invalidating the formula used to determine which state and local governments must comply with the act’s preclearance requirement. [read post]