Search for: "SYSTEMS APPLICATION & TECHNOLOGIES, INC v. USA" Results 61 - 80 of 229
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Mar 2022, 7:56 am by Dennis Crouch
Mar. 24, 2022) (“code”, “application” and “system”); and VDPP LLC, v. [read post]
20 Sep 2021, 3:31 pm by Dennis Crouch
Optis Cellular Technology, LLC (appealing institution denials); Infineum USA L.P. v. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 12:05 pm by Law Lady
ALBERT, in his official capacity as Georgia State University Associate Provost for Information System and Technology, MARK P. [read post]
6 May 2014, 8:42 am by WIMS
Appeals Court Environmental Decisions   <> Monroe Energy, LLC v. [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 2:32 pm by Marta Requejo
CACI International, Inc. 13-1937 page 31 [6] Suhail Najim Abdullah Al Shimari; Taha Yaseen Arraq Rashid; Salah Hasan Nusaif Al-Ejaili; Asa’ad Hamza Hanfoosh Al Zuba’e v CACI Premier Technology, Inc. [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 12:12 pm
Patent landscape analytics may prove you wrong (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) Why sinking markets could mean real opportunities for patent acquirers and licensees (IAM) &nbsp; Global - Copyright Copyright still viable, at least for top authors (IP finance) Understanding the backlash cost in copying someone else's work (Techdirt) &nbsp; Africa Designers from all OAPI (Organisation Africaine de la Propriete Intellectuelle) countries to benefit from fee reductions (Afro-IP) (WIPO) WIPO and… [read post]
28 Dec 2006, 3:48 pm
Headquartered in Columbus, Indiana, (USA), Cummins Inc. designs, manufactures, distributes and services engines and related technologies, including fuel systems, controls, air handling, filtration, emission solutions and electrical power generation systems. “As a design and manufacturing company, it is critical to have high-performance solutions that can scale as our business grows,” said Curt Brown, Storage Technology Director,… [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 10:26 am
See Lucent Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 4:56 am
Shure, Inc (GRAY on Claims) (Patently-O) (EDTexweblog.com) CAFC on relative claim terminology: Power-One, Inc v Artesyn Technologies, Inc (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (EDTexweblog.com) CAFC: Panel disagrees regarding use of incorporation by reference to identify structure for means-plus-function claims: Pressure Products Medical Supplies, Inc. v. [read post]