Search for: "State of Vermont Supreme Court Justices"
Results 61 - 80
of 843
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jun 2011, 8:41 am
Justice Kennedy wrote for the Court; Justice Breyer dissented in an opinion joined by Justices Ginsburg and Kagan. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 10:06 am
The Vermont Supreme Court ruled that the state court product liability lawsuit was not preempted by the FDA approval of the drug's label, a significant ruling for those seeking to preserve consumer rights. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 7:59 am
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg wrote separately to state that, unlike in Randall, Alaska’s law does not exhibit certain features found troublesome in Vermont’s law. [read post]
2 May 2022, 1:30 am
There are nine states without intermediate courts: Delaware, Maine, Montana, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, South Dakota, Vermont, West Virginia, and Wyoming. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 11:37 am
The Supreme Court disagreed with lower courts that found that such an agreement would be unconscionable under state law. [read post]
29 May 2024, 3:16 pm
In March, the Alaska Supreme Court held in State v. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 1:57 pm
The Vermont Supreme Court, in State v. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 2:47 pm
Supreme Court? [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 2:19 am
Supreme Court ruled on Thursday that states cannot make it a crime for a drunken driving suspect to refuse to take a blood test but can criminalize the refusal to take breath tests to determine alcohol levels. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 10:33 am
Alaska’s limits have some of the same “danger signs” that the court found in the Vermont law, the justices reasoned. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 2:03 pm
In the case of a Supreme Court justice, the Senate approves the nomination and the person becomes a Supreme Court justice. [read post]
16 Nov 2019, 8:30 am
[An interesting question now being litigated in Vermont federal court.] [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 10:06 am
I was wrong when I predicted that "the Roberts Court will disagree with the Vermont Supreme Court on the deference due the Bush FDA's pronouncements on conflict preemption and declare that, adhering to Chevron, it will reverse the Vermont Supreme Court in Levine. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 11:32 am
The Supreme Court ruling in United States v. [read post]
20 Feb 2016, 6:40 am
” What is “permitted” is based on Supreme Court of the United States’ (“SCOTUS”) case law. [read post]
10 Mar 2009, 1:10 pm
When the court accepted the speedy-trial case, Vermont v. [read post]
13 Jan 2009, 6:30 am
On appeal, the Vermont Supreme Court applied the four-part test set out in Barker v. [read post]
25 Jun 2022, 6:50 pm
Abortion policy is now in the hands of the states following the US Supreme Court’s Friday decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 5:39 am
Earlier this month, I wrote a blog post about Vermont Senator Patrick Leahy's proposal to allow retired Supreme Court justices to hear cases to avoid 4-4 splits in conflict situations, an issue that is getting attention because of the conflicts that Justice Kagan has for many pending cases. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 5:39 am
Earlier this month, I wrote a blog post about Vermont Senator Patrick Leahy's proposal to allow retired Supreme Court justices to hear cases to avoid 4-4 splits in conflict situations, an issue that is getting attention because of the conflicts that Justice Kagan has for many pending cases. [read post]
