Search for: "Stephen Goldstein"
Results 61 - 80
of 400
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Aug 2017, 12:35 pm
Jon Ballis, Kirkland & Ellis Rosemary Batt, Cornell University, ILR School Neil Fligstein, UC Berkeley Sociology Department Stephen Fraidin, Pershing Square Capital Management Will Gaybrick, Stripe Adam Goldstein, Princeton University Department of Sociology Victoria Ivashina, Harvard Business School Andrew Metrick, Yale School of Management Meridee Moore, Watershed Asset Management John Morley, Yale Law School Alan Schwartz, Yale Law School David Swensen, Chief Investment… [read post]
19 Aug 2019, 4:02 am
” [Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is counsel on an amicus brief in support of respondent Stephens in this case.] [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 5:54 am
NPR’s Nina Totenberg and this blog’s Tom Goldstein discuss the Term with Robert Siegel, while at the Los Angeles Times David Savage observes that “perhaps the biggest dynamic driving this term was overreaching by the Court’s conservative justices. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 10:24 am
Coke's lawyers, Stephen H. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 10:24 am
Coke's lawyers, Stephen H. [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 5:00 am
In Los Angeles Times, David Savage reports on the “alliance” between two Justices from California: Anthony Kennedy and Stephen Breyer. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 7:31 am
Vladeck and Stephen I. [read post]
5 Sep 2007, 12:29 pm
Clients use adjectives such as “impeccable”, “genius”, “simply superb”, and “quite excellent” in describing Stephen Albainy-Jenei, Karlyn Schnapp, Steven Goldstein and David Schmit. [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 6:18 pm
Clients use adjectives such as “impeccable”, “genius”, “simply superb”, and “quite excellent” in describing Stephen Albainy-Jenei, Karlyn Schnapp, Steven Goldstein and David Schmit. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 7:22 pm
Justice Stephen Breyer asked Katyal how this would be different than a citizen of one state facing the potentially biased juries of another state for conduct in the forum state. [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 7:45 am
” –Stephen M. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 11:00 am
Stephen S. [read post]
22 Mar 2013, 2:01 pm
Here are links to important resources and commentary on the state of indigent defense at Gideon's golden anniversary: ACLU: "Too Many Still Wait to Hear Gideon's Trumpet" Stephen Bright and Sia Sanneh: "'Gideon v. [read post]
29 Nov 2019, 4:07 am
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is counsel on an amicus brief in support of respondent Stephens in this case.] [read post]
30 Nov 2006, 8:04 am
Goldstein referred to experts who had testified that the Teleflex patent was not obvious, the chief justice asked: "Who do you get to be an expert to tell you something's not obvious? [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 7:05 am
” At Harvard Law School’s Bill of Health blog, Gregory Curfman responds to Tom Goldstein’s post at this blog, in which Goldstein suggested that Justice Stephen Breyer may have joined the majority in last week’s order in the Wheaton College case because he “accomplished much more by joining the majority than by dissenting. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 7:19 am
Stephen Crane (Ret.), JAMS,Clarence Epstein, Ph.D., Senior Director, Urban and Cultural Affairs, Concordia UniversityThomas R. [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 3:56 am
” [Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is counsel on an amicus brief in support of respondent Stephens in this case.] [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 6:03 am
In his “SCOTUS for law students” feature for this blog, Stephen Wermiel looks at Salinas v. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 7:43 am
Justice Stephen G. [read post]
