Search for: "T. G., II"
Results 61 - 80
of 2,341
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Nov 2008, 8:00 pm
Robertson II. [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 3:06 pm
On ii) Mr G argued that being accommodated in the temporary accommodation under the s.193 duty meant that he was no longer homeless. [read post]
21 Jan 2013, 5:01 pm
The present claim is comparable to the device claims of the auxiliary request in decision T 775/97 [3.1] which were found not to fall under the exclusion clause of A 52(4) EPC 1973.The reasoning of T 82/93 [1.5-5] is not applicable to the present situation either. [read post]
8 May 2023, 11:43 pm
As detailed below, the Enlarged Board's basic reasoning used in arriving at its final conclusion is quite general and unrelated to any general emergency considerations.1.6 In a recent case, the view has been expressed with regard to Article 15a RPBA 2020 that the exercise of discretion in deciding on the format of the oral proceedings was to be based on the criterion of the "appropriateness" of the format only - as set out in that provision -, and that no further criteria are binding… [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 12:30 am
At the time, T 0844/18 was considered the end of the road for the patent. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 4:02 am
T 1946/15 - 3.2.02 en date du 19 octobre 2016 et T 198/16 – 3.5.04 en date du 20 mars 2018 - Courant jurisprudentiel dit « majoritaire »II Observations des tiersB MOTIFS DE L'AVISI Recevabilité de la saisine1. [read post]
18 Oct 2019, 2:26 am
At the end of the oral proceedings held on 6 December 2000 during which the appellant had submitted several sets of claims, the decision of the Board of Appeal in case T 1032/97 - 3.4.1 was given on the basis of the last submitted set of claims 1 to 21, deciding that1. the decision under appeal is set aside and2. the case is remitted to the first instance for further prosecution on the basis of claims 1 to 21, contained in the main request filed on 6 December 2000.II. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 1:00 am
The title of the application is "Tetraploid corn salad".II. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 5:01 pm
This is the (final) decision in the case that led to decision G 2/10 of the Enlarged Board (EBA)Claim 1 of the main request before the Board read:1. [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 10:07 am
Well, under G(6)(ii), this is the first condition under which funds may be received within 180 days. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 5:01 pm
The Board also offers us some interesting – and possibly controversial – findings on how to understand certain statements of G 2/98. [read post]
19 Dec 2009, 11:17 am
T 413/02 and T 478/99 are not relevant for the same reason. [read post]
1 Feb 2022, 12:32 am
II. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 8:04 am
Justice Stephen G. [read post]
10 Jan 2018, 2:17 am
Auflage 2016, § 50 margin note 15; also German Federal Supreme Court, decision of 8 October 2013, II ZR 281/12). [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 4:25 am
n 5. gününde Arabuluculuk Kurultay? [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 2:40 am
However, according to the established case law, Rule 116(1) EPC (former Rule 71a EPC 1973) should not be construed as an invitation to file new evidence or other material departing from the legal and factual framework of issues and grounds pleaded (see T 39/93, headnote) as established with the notice of opposition according to Rule 76(c) EPC (former Rule 55(c) 1973, see G 9/91, point 6 of the Reasons). [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 11:08 pm
. 'With regard to the conditions that the disclaimer meets the requirements of clarity and conciseness and does not remove more than necessary to restore novelty, both explicitly indicated in G 1/03 (see headnote, points 2.2 and 2.4), the Board concurs with the positions expressed in T 2130/11, points 2.9 and 2.10*. [read post]
1 Jan 2014, 5:01 pm
A pipe characterised in that it is a pressure pipe comprising the multimodal polymer composition according to any one of the preceding claims, which pipe withstands a pressure of 8.0 MPa gauge during 50 years at 20°C (MRS8.0).[2] The question to be answered when assessing sufficiency of disclosure is whether the invention as defined in the claims can be performed by a person skilled in the art throughout the whole area(s) claimed without undue burden, taking into account the information given in… [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 6:16 am
The statement setting out the grounds of appeal was received on 19 November 2014.II. [read post]
