Search for: "T. QUILLEN"
Results 61 - 80
of 93
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jun 2008, 10:51 am
")Prior art may not be in Wegner's vocabulary.One recalls that Wegner was involved in the Quillen/Webster business:If one looks at the second paper of Quillen and Webster (wherein the 97% grant figure is "qualified", 12 Fed. [read post]
10 May 2008, 6:06 pm
Quillen and Webster's "97% patent grant rate" number was a scam all along. [read post]
25 Apr 2008, 1:10 pm
So Jon Dudas may be playing a game here, but it's a game inspired by Quillen and Webster, and later Jaffe and Lerner. [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 1:21 am
The NAS study was on the question of whether there was a directional change -- and the conclusion wasn't that there wasn't, but that it didn't test it. [read post]
27 Mar 2008, 2:33 am
Anderson's piece is really a non-starter.Further, Nate Anderson falls victim to the Quillen/Webster assertion that patent grant rate correlates with quality: These things don't "promote innovation," as Dudas noted, but they do make increasing economic sense for many businesses. [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 1:33 pm
This also sort of reminds one of how some patent reformers cited to Quillen and Webster for a 97% patent grant rate, even though no such thing was in Quillen and Webster. [read post]
1 Feb 2008, 12:38 am
Quillen and and Webster show up, obliquely, through a cite to the NAS/STEP report (footnote 8). [read post]
27 Jan 2008, 7:58 am
Kevin Garnett didn't play. [read post]
27 Jan 2008, 5:42 am
He doesn't deny the study was fraudulent, but claims Flamm defamed him by persisting. [read post]
14 Nov 2007, 10:21 pm
Chandler can start with me, but he should also note that Cecil Quillen also opposes oppositions. [read post]
16 Oct 2007, 10:27 am
Quillen also opined that the private bar would not do it. [read post]
29 Aug 2007, 10:20 am
Don't add an inspection step. [read post]
24 Aug 2007, 10:37 am
Quillen, Jr. [read post]
19 Aug 2007, 4:29 pm
Most of my favorites weren't covered. [read post]
17 Aug 2007, 10:16 pm
Rutgers had a good season (one can't buy tickets for 2007 Rutgers football games) and one can't find "Rutgers is Wrong" anymore. [read post]
12 Aug 2007, 11:18 pm
One hopes not, but then look at the traction on Quillen and Webster. [read post]
7 Aug 2007, 4:20 am
Quillen, Jr., The U.S. [read post]
31 Jul 2007, 10:42 am
However, this number doesn't account for continuations. [read post]
31 Jul 2007, 12:39 am
L.J. 727, 754 (2002).The interesting part is that Thomas says something about the 97% patent grant rate that Quillen and Webster didn't really say. [read post]
