Search for: "U. S. v. Marks"
Results 61 - 80
of 1,446
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Aug 2023, 5:36 am
Louis U. [read post]
7 Aug 2023, 9:17 am
Monroe v. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
Corp. v Kassis, 182 AD2d 22, 27 [1st Dept 1992] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted], lv dismissed and denied 80 NY2d 1005 [1992]; see Foley v Roche, 68 AD2d 558, 567-568 [1st Dept 1979]). [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
Corp. v Kassis, 182 AD2d 22, 27 [1st Dept 1992] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted], lv dismissed and denied 80 NY2d 1005 [1992]; see Foley v Roche, 68 AD2d 558, 567-568 [1st Dept 1979]). [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 11:41 am
Introduction With its decision in Adolph v. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 6:12 am
" 209 U. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
Ricotta & Marks, P.C., Long Island City, NY (Thomas A. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
Ricotta & Marks, P.C., Long Island City, NY (Thomas A. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 8:32 am
In Yegiazaryan v. [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm
In Groff v. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 7:19 am
European Community, 579 U. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 7:19 am
European Community, 579 U. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 1:47 pm
’s worldwide sales under the trademarks that infringed on Hetronic’s mark. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 2:55 am
Although the Court of Appeal was clear, in Neurim v Generics [2020] EWCA Civ 793, that deciding to uphold the lower court’s decision not to grant a pharmaceutical patent PI was based on the specific facts of that case, the Patents Court has subsequently refused two further pharmaceutical PIs (Neurim v Teva [2022] EWHC 954 (Pat) and [2022] EWHC 1641(Pat), and Novartis v Teva [2022] EWHC 959 (Ch)). [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 5:01 am
From Project Veritas v. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 3:51 am
In Chewy v. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 11:38 pm
S., at ___ (slip op., at 24) (quoting MCI, 512 U. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 11:59 am
Co. v. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 6:45 am
S. 456, 464 (1996) (decisions about enforcement of “the Nation’s criminal laws” lie within the “special province of the Executive” (internal quotation marks omitted)); Buckley v. [read post]
2 Jul 2023, 4:00 am
En fin de journée, il a reçu une note du jury comprenant 2 questions. [read post]