Search for: "UNION CARBIDE"
Results 61 - 80
of 261
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Feb 2016, 11:57 am
It has been a little over two years since the Supreme Court issued its decision in Bauman v. [read post]
2 Dec 2015, 10:01 am
Union Carbide Corp. [read post]
18 Nov 2015, 4:43 pm
Union Carbide case opens up the question of whether evidence of a total failure to mediate would be admissible. [read post]
18 Nov 2015, 11:44 am
Holding that the Third District Court of Appeal had erred in applying the Restatement (Third) of Torts’ risk-utility test, instead of the Restatement (Second) of Torts’ consumer expectations test, to a product liability design defect claim, the Florida Supreme Court reinstated a jury verdict in the amount of $6,624,150 against Union Carbide, the supplier of asbestos used in joint compounds and ceiling texture sprays used by a construction worker who developed… [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 6:20 am
Union Carbide, the Florida Supreme Court reversed an appellate court’s adoption of more stringent proof requirements for injured parties. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 2:56 am
Union Carbide Corp., No. [read post]
7 Nov 2015, 5:46 am
Union Carbide Corp. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 1:07 pm
Union Carbide Corp., October 28, 2015, Manella, N.). [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 10:13 am
He subsequently sued several defendants, including Union Carbide, the maker of the asbestos. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 5:00 am
Ever since this blog started, we’vemadeplainthat we have no use for the so-called “heeding presumption. [read post]
26 Aug 2015, 5:00 am
Union Carbide Corporation, No. 2015-CV-1903 (C.P. [read post]
14 Jun 2015, 2:00 pm
Union Carbide support this functional view. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 8:33 am
After he was diagnosed with mesothelioma in 2009, he sued both the plant and Union Carbide, the company that produced the asbestos used in his home. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 5:52 am
Since Daimler AG v. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 4:00 am
Supreme Court of Canada’s unanimous decision earlier this year in Union Carbide Inc. v. [read post]
19 Dec 2014, 9:02 pm
According to a recent case before the California Court of Appeal, defendant purchased an asbestos mine in Coalinga, California in the early 1960s. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 11:56 pm
For instance, the court in Drinkwater v Union Carbide Corp. held that even though the employee was not able to establish a hostile work environment claim based on a few isolated incidents, she was able to make a retaliation claim, because she reasonably and in good faith believed that the harassers highly offensive sexual remarks constituted harassment when she made a protected complaint about the same to her higher management. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 3:56 pm
For instance, the court in Drinkwater v Union Carbide Corp. held that even though the employee was not able to establish a hostile work environment claim based on a few isolated incidents, she was able to make a retaliation claim, because she reasonably and in good faith believed that the harassers highly offensive sexual remarks constituted harassment when she made a protected complaint about the same to her higher management. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 3:56 pm
For instance, the court in Drinkwater v Union Carbide Corp. held that even though the employee was not able to establish a hostile work environment claim based on a few isolated incidents, she was able to make a retaliation claim, because she reasonably and in good faith believed that the harassers highly offensive sexual remarks constituted harassment when she made a protected complaint about the same to her higher management. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 12:43 pm
Union Carbide Corp. v. [read post]
