Search for: "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA"
Results 61 - 80
of 2,170
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Nov 2023, 1:26 pm
In light of Trader Joe’s previous failed attempts to force the platform’s creators to cease use of “Trader Joe”, Trader Joe’s brought suit in the United States District Court for the District of Central California against both the creators and Trader Joe asserting causes of action for federal trademark infringement, federal trademark dilution, violations of the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act,… [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 1:26 pm
In light of Trader Joe’s previous failed attempts to force the platform’s creators to cease use of “Trader Joe”, Trader Joe’s brought suit in the United States District Court for the District of Central California against both the creators and Trader Joe asserting causes of action for federal trademark infringement, federal trademark dilution, violations of the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act,… [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 9:23 am
The ordinance regulated picketing "by classifications formulated in terms of the subject of the picketing," the Supreme Court wrote—focusing on the discrimination present on the face of the enactment—and the "central problem" was that the ordinance "describe[d] permissible picketing in terms of its subject matter. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 11:06 am
Equal Access Group are filed in United States District Court, Central District of California. [read post]
6 Oct 2023, 9:00 am
District Court in North Dakota that ruled the complaint was tardy, and the U.S. [read post]
6 Oct 2023, 8:00 am
On August 12, 2009, the United States District Court for the Central District of California issued a judgment enforcing a $6.5 million dollar Chinese judgment against an American corporate defendant under California’s version of the Uniform Foreign Money Judgments Recognition Act and in 2011, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court’s decision. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 2:55 am
Central Command said in a statement. [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
As lawsuits proceeded in other jurisdictions seeking to block DACA’s termination, Republican state elected officials returned to Hanen seeking essentially the opposite relief: a ruling declaring that DACA is unlawful and an injunction requiring the initiative to be immediately terminated. [read post]
27 Sep 2023, 3:24 am
The Supreme Court yesterday rejected Alabama’s bid to keep its sixth white majority congressional district out of seven. [read post]
26 Sep 2023, 2:57 am
The Solomon Islands’ growing relationship with China has concerned the United States. [read post]
22 Sep 2023, 5:55 am
United States, and United States v. [read post]
20 Sep 2023, 3:18 am
Specifically, Applicant explains by way of background that to resolve a prior trademark infringement action between the parties in the United States District Court for the Central District of California, Case No. 8:18-cv-02194 (JVS-KES), the parties entered into a Settlement Agreement, which explicitly states that so long as Applicant abandoned its earlier-filed trademark application Serial No. 87912445, Opposer would not oppose… [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 7:42 am
[As I will blog soon, California’s law requiring online businesses to advance the “best interests” of children also failed a constitutional challenge.] [read post]
15 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
District Court Judge Terry Doughty issued in July. [read post]
12 Sep 2023, 3:10 pm
Regents of University of California (1995) 37 Cal.App.4th 1025 and Chawanakee Unified School District v. [read post]
12 Sep 2023, 9:16 am
The District Court initially froze Yegiazaryan’s California assets before finally entering judgment against him. [read post]
6 Sep 2023, 2:35 pm
United States, 1958’s NAACP v. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
District Court Judge Tanya Chutkan said her decision could not take into consideration the former president’s other responsibilities. [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 4:38 pm
One of the predominant tests is the so-called “Stilwell test,” based on the decision from the United States District Court for the Central District of California in Stilwell Dev., Inc. v. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 5:56 am
The district court for the Northern District of California dismissed the investors’ first amended complaint without leave to further amend, holding that the complaint failed to connect any particularized facts about the company’s cryptocurrency revenues to the allegedly false statements. [read post]
