Search for: "UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. INTERNATIONAL PAPER COMPANY et al" Results 61 - 71 of 71
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Aug 2008, 12:54 am
– Technological Innovation and Intellectual Property), IP and start-ups: (Technological Innovation and Intellectual Property), Innovators: Make sure your company owns the fruits of your open innovation projects: (IP Asset Maximizer Blog), It’s all about the numbers: SuperCrunchers of patent data will gain competitive advantage: (IP Asset Maximizer Blog)   Events 4-9 August: Dept Science & Technology indigenous knowledge systems expo and workshop… [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 12:09 pm by Schachtman
Bartrip, Beyond the Factory Gates: Asbestos and Health in Twentieth Century America 77 & n.4 (2006); Peter W.J. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 6:50 pm by admin
  Selikoff served as an intern, at the Beth Israel Hospital, in Newark, New Jersey.[20] 1944 – 1946. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am by Ben
In Europe, The Court of Justice of the European Union ruled that the consent of a copyright holder does not cover the distribution of an object incorporating a work where that object has been altered after its initial marketing to such an extent that it constitutes a new reproduction of that work (Case C‑419/13, Art & Allposters International BV v Stichting Pictoright) with Eleonora opining that the decision means that that there is no such thing as a general… [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 7:09 pm by Jacob Fishman
Thus far, despite all of the agreed words on paper, there has been little if any change in the upward trajectory of global greenhouse gas emissions. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 3:41 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
The firm: They don’t have the externalities problem b/c they internalize benefits of buying. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 8:57 pm
It was Corzine's stated goal to transform MF Global from a commodity broker into an investment bank with a large proprietary trading operation similar to the one Corzine ran at Goldman in the 1990s. [read post]
10 May 2010, 1:16 pm by admin
The company has agreed to pay a civil penalty of $310,000, of which $155,000 will be paid to the United States and the other $155,000 to Virginia. [read post]