Search for: "UNITED STATES v. CLAYTON et al"
Results 61 - 75
of 75
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Aug 2011, 11:10 pm
Saudi Arabian Oil Co.Docket: 10-1393Issue(s): (1) Whether the political question doctrine deprives the federal courts of jurisdiction to adjudicate a Sherman Act and Clayton Act damage case against both private and state-owned businesses operating in the United States; and (2) whether the act of state doctrine bars antitrust claims against defendants whose conduct was commercial, and where it came to fruition and had its effect in the United… [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 4:14 pm
SanDisk Corporation, et al., United States District Court, ND Cal., Case No. 5:10-CV02787-JF/HRL, the court denied a motion to dismiss in a Walker Process "fraud on patent office" case, and allowed standing to a direct purchaser. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 2:00 am
United States, 642 F. [read post]
15 Aug 2010, 6:52 am
The lawsuit, captioned Gregorio de la Rosa, Sr., et al., v. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 1:07 pm
Citing Stump v. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 11:15 am
– United States Environmental Protection Agency, July 26, 2010 Rhode Island Airport Corporation and its demolition contractors, O.R. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 4:05 am
Via Howard Bashman, whose client won, comes the Third Circuit's Sullivan et al. v. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 4:56 am
National Football League et al. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 2:18 am
The Case against Consolidation United States antitrust law aims to eliminate transactions that threaten the competitive process. [read post]
11 Nov 2008, 5:43 am
"[18] Significantly, anti-trust laws do not necessarily guarantee low prices, only the conditions that lead to them.[19] This distinction is intentional; the United States Supreme Court has recognized that while it may set the circumstances for achieving a fair price, the workings of a liberal market are better able to determine the fair price itself.[20] While anti-trust laws prohibit fixing maximum prices, the entire goal of the FPGPA is to accomplish… [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 10:59 pm
Clayton Crenshaw Alabama State House (334) 242-7300 Office of the Attorney General 11 South Union Street Montgomery, AL 36130-0152 Party name: Richard F. [read post]
2 Dec 2007, 1:58 am
Clayton Crenshaw Alabama State House (334) 242-7300 Office of the Attorney General 11 South Union Street Montgomery, AL 36130-0152 Party name: Richard F. [read post]
29 Nov 2007, 11:52 pm
Clayton Crenshaw Alabama State House (334) 242-7300 Office of the Attorney General 11 South Union Street Montgomery, AL 36130-0152 Party name: Richard F. [read post]
3 Mar 2007, 9:59 am
Gonzales Northern District of Ohio at YoungstownIMMIGRATION: Reopening 07a0080p.06 2007/02/26 Adrian Energy, et al v. [read post]
12 Jan 2007, 12:14 am
Ronald Robinson et al., defendants
NEW YORK COUNTYCivil PracticeReferee's Report of Criminal Contempt Rejected; Cannot Have Such Finding Without Notice 24 Seven Inc. v. [read post]
