Search for: "USA v. Robert Smith" Results 61 - 80 of 162
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Feb 2020, 3:44 am by Edith Roberts
 Smith, in which Justice Antonin Scalia “concluded that courts could not use the First Amendment’s free exercise clause to carve out exemptions from ‘neutral laws of general applicability,’” in a new case, Ricks v. [read post]
14 Mar 2018, 4:05 am by Edith Roberts
” NFIB weighs in on Knick v. [read post]
18 Jun 2021, 5:10 am by Marcia Coyle
But Roberts said the city’s policy fell outside of Smith because it was not generally applicable. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 9:15 am by SteinMcewen, LLP
McEwen* Introduction In the article included in the Stein McEwen Newsletter entitled Overview of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act: What Is The Practical Effect of First-to-File for Patent Applicants (October 2011), the novelty portions of the American Invents Act were explored. [read post]
13 Dec 2008, 12:13 am
PUBLISHED OPINIONS Opinion Short Title/District 08a0415p.06  Smith v. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 3:42 am by Edith Roberts
Patent and Trademark Office v. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 6:59 am
  At the Washington Post, Robert Barnes reports on the oral argument, as does Adam Liptak at the New York Times, detailing the Justices' strenuous questioning of both sides; USA Today posits that the Court appeared "poised" to strike down the law, which bans the sale of depictions of animal cruelty. [read post]
13 Jul 2007, 4:07 pm
For the reasons set forth below, we AFFIRM the judgment of the district court. 07a0256p.06 2007/07/10 USA v. [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 6:42 pm by Howard Bashman
Robert Barnes of The Washington Post reports that “Supreme Court seems to side with web designer opposed to same-sex marriage; Colorado’s Lorie Smith says being forced to create websites for gay couples would violate her right to free speech. [read post]
23 Jan 2018, 4:33 am by Edith Roberts
Smith, which asks who should pay attorney’s fees in successful civil-rights cases brought on behalf of prisoners, and Marinello v. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 4:09 am by Edith Roberts
Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit in Trump v. [read post]
25 Jul 2018, 8:36 am by Sharon Bradford Franklin
In addition to the “voluntary disclosure” aspect of the third-party doctrine, the Supreme Court’s opinion in Smith v. [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 3:49 am by Edith Roberts
At ACS, Robert Smith discusses the decision, noting that it “strongly suggests that five justices on the Court” believe that a sentencer is required “to find that a juvenile is permanently incorrigible before imposing a LWOP sentence. [read post]