Search for: "USA v. Search Warrant" Results 61 - 80 of 276
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Nov 2018, 10:20 am by Eric Goldman
These nine firms found such keyword bidding to be worth the cost, and Google determined their advertisements were sufficiently relevant to warrant display. [read post]
14 Nov 2018, 12:15 pm by Kevin
A portion of this was seized in May 2017 following the execution of a search warrant, and has remained in federal custody ever since. [read post]
” To “defraud the United States” has a specific meaning under U.S. case law: According to Hammerschmidt v. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 11:00 am by Susan Landau
The Supreme Court ruled that the fact that the search was carried out from outside the house did not negate a warrant requirement. [read post]
1 Jul 2018, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
“Exigent circumstances” are exceptional circumstances which are fact sensitive and need to be considered carefully in order to justify a derogation from searches having to be subject to a warrant. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 4:20 am by Edith Roberts
” In an op-ed for The Hill, Ashley Baker calls the ruling “a major victory for privacy rights that will reign in the increasing tendency of the government to use subpoena power to circumvent the higher standards of a search warrant. [read post]
24 Jun 2018, 1:51 pm by David Kris
S. 27 (2001), which held that the use of a thermal imager to detect heat radiating from a home was a search; to United States v. [read post]
30 May 2018, 4:04 am by Edith Roberts
Virginia, in which the justices held 8-1 that the automobile exception to the warrant requirement does not permit a warrantless search of a motorcycle parked in the driveway of a home. [read post]
10 Jan 2018, 4:28 am by Edith Roberts
Yesterday the justices heard two Fourth Amendment cases, both involving searches of motor vehicles. [read post]
9 Jan 2018, 4:32 am by Edith Roberts
For USA Today, Richard Wolf reports that in Tharpe v. [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 4:20 am by Edith Roberts
Virginia, in which the justices will consider the scope of the automobile exception to the warrant requirement, concluding that “on the issues briefed I would think the state hasn’t made the case that the search was lawful. [read post]