Search for: "United States of Ame v. Currency"
Results 61 - 80
of 127
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Apr 2017, 7:19 am
HeinOnline World Treaties Library This monumental collection brings together Rohn, Dumont, Bevans, Martens, League of Nations, United States, and United Nations treaties into one easy-to-use and fully searchable database. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 7:08 pm
("Canton is not Boston: The Invention of American Imperial Sovereignty," 57 Am. [read post]
28 Dec 2016, 1:30 am
To achieve the vital goal of substantially reforming existing food systems in the United States in the context of changing climatic, political, and sociolegal conditions, the panelists will articulate their visions of the centrality of interracial justice to confronting food oppression and cultivating Furthering Liberty for People With Disabilities Post- Meyer v. [read post]
18 Jul 2016, 7:47 am
At issue are these three certified questions of state law from the United States District Court, Southern District of Ohio, Western Division: What is the statute of limitations for claims of negligent misidentification? [read post]
21 Feb 2016, 12:11 pm
In the case of United States v. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 5:05 pm
John Reed Stark David Fontaine In this day and age, the members of the boards of directors of most companies understand that cybersecurity issues are both important and should be a board-level priority. [read post]
18 Sep 2015, 9:12 pm
The Amendment’s text reads:All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside.This powerful piece of constitutional text has ensured for 150 years that whatever else happens to people at the bottom rungs of American society, whose own legal status in our polity may be doubtful, their children, at least, are full legal citizens of the… [read post]
20 Aug 2015, 10:08 am
Forty-one of the 47 state members of the HRC nevertheless voted to accept it; the sole negative vote came from the United States, while the five abstentions came from India, Kenya, Ethiopia, Paraguay and Macedonia. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 6:38 am
” This statement sounds very much like the interpretive principle underlying one of John Marshall’s most famous remarks in McCulloch v. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 4:23 pm
Now it’s possible to look at when people stopped saying “the United States are” and said “the United States is” by copying the contents of an entire library: a nonexpressive use. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 4:14 am
As discussed here, in Public Employees’ Retirement System of Mississippi, v. [read post]
21 Dec 2014, 4:17 am
United States In Ratzlaf v. [read post]
27 Nov 2014, 12:00 am
[xiii] An excellent discussion of the legislative history and Congressional intent of this statute is discussed in United States v. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 4:26 am
NOMURA ASSET ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION et al, United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts, No. 06-10446-RGS. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 6:50 am
") Published: 7/21/2014 11:33 AM [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 2:07 pm
Am. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 12:46 am
The SEC complaint can be found here.Shavers main argument was that the BTCST investments were not securities because Bitcoin is not money, and is not part of anything regulated by the United States. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 12:11 am
Of these “fixes,” the most commonly used one is computed at 4:00 pm by a joint venture between State Street’s WM unit and Thompson Reuters (Thompson Reuters was also involved with setting the Libor rates).9] However, at least one recent article discussed potential investigations into “Tokyo fixing”, referring to Japanese currency benchmarks (which are set at 9:55 each morning in Tokyo).[10] The potential attempted manipulation… [read post]
4 Jan 2014, 9:47 am
Gelb, “Mortality Experience of Amosite Asbestos Factory Workers : Dose-Response Relationships 5 to 40 Years After Onset of Short-Term Work Exposure,” 10 Am. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 1:53 pm
Interestingly, however, in addition to citing Russell, in its decision last week, the court also cited United States v. [read post]
