Search for: "United States of America v. Various Works of Art" Results 61 - 80 of 176
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jan 2018, 3:00 am by Garrett Hinck
Submissions from outside the United States are welcomed. [read post]
6 Sep 2016, 7:46 pm
The voting was as follows:  In favour: Algeria, Benin, Burkina Faso, China, Congo, Côte d’Ivoire, Cuba, Ethiopia, India, Indonesia, Kazakhstan, Kenya, Morocco, Namibia, Pakistan, Philippines, Russian Federation, South Africa, Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of), Viet Nam Against: Austria, Czech Republic, Estonia, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Montenegro, Republic of Korea, Romania, the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, United Kingdom of Great Britain and… [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 3:00 am by Garrett Hinck
Submissions from outside the United States are welcomed. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 3:00 am by Garrett Hinck
Submissions from outside the United States are welcomed. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 9:07 am by Matthew Kahn
Submissions from outside the United States are welcomed. [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 3:09 pm
United States, 505 U.S. 144, 156—159, 177 (1992). [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 2:39 pm by Camilla Alexandra Hrdy
For example, Lee cites Justice Grier's dissent in O'Reilly v. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 5:02 pm by Wolfgang Demino
In late November 2009, plaintiff spent a week in a hospital in Florida due to severe lower back and hip pain.While in Florida, plaintiff also took on various odd jobs in addition to her legal work. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 12:39 am by INFORRM
Art, Music and Copyright On 8 June 2022, judgment was handed down in Shazam v Only Fools The Dining Experience and Others [2022] EWHC 1379. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 12:15 pm by dirklasater
Copyright law in America, as opposed to many other regimes, [read post]
9 Feb 2007, 8:05 am
In 2006, the list was topped by applications from the United States of America (USA), Japan, Germany, Republic of Korea and France. [read post]
6 Mar 2018, 9:53 am by Eugene Volokh
And the United States Supreme Court has already—unanimously—held that an economic boycott based on race, namely a boycott of white-owned businesses, is a constitutionally protected form of protest. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 9:33 am by William McGrath
According to the indictment, members of the conspiracy worked to conceal the illicit payments through various means. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 10:27 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
In particular, because of the Supreme Court’s recent opinion in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
31 Jan 2015, 8:24 pm
After six years of work, the United Nations Human Rights Council approved his Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights. [read post]