Search for: "Vermont Defender General's Office"
Results 61 - 80
of 380
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jul 2007, 6:11 am
In Colorado, for example, all indigent defense cases go to the Federal Defenders' office and only if they have a conflict (usually in multi-defendant cases since a lawyer generally can only represent one client in a case), does a CJA panel lawyer get appointed. [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 9:20 am
The majority notes that this is a more-exacting approach than general notice pleading requirements, justifying this departure by proceeding under Rule 60 as opposed to general pleading rules. [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 12:44 pm
The law directed the inspectors general from the NSA, DoD, CIA, DoJ and Office of the Director of National intelligence to create reports explaining what the Bush spying programs entailed, and to create a single, unclassified summary. [read post]
9 Oct 2021, 12:43 pm
In doing so, the majority overrules 2019’s deer-jacking-peeking-in-the-garage case where the majority went with “the man” and said it was cool for police officers to go peeking in people’s garages looking for evidence of nefariousness.Because the officer here exceeded the scope of his license, his while-I’m-here . . . looky-loo gets the bullet suppressed and the case remanded for a new trial without the offending bullet.Apparently,… [read post]
5 Feb 2013, 9:34 pm
The officers followed her.When they arrived back, the officers again knocked on Defendant’s door and told him they wanted to talk. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 1:26 pm
The filing signals the states’ intention to join with the EPA in defending EPA’s decision. [read post]
30 Jan 2021, 8:37 am
SCOV affirms, noting that the argument wasn’t properly preserved and further reasoning that in this context—with no Miranda evidence introduced at trial—whether the officers gave defendant his Miranda warnings or not was irrelevant to the elements of the charge. [read post]
15 Dec 2007, 7:07 am
Boucher, 2007 WL 4246473 (November 29, 2007):On December 17, 2006, defendant Sebastien Boucher was arrested on a complaint charging him with transportation of child pornography in violation of 18 U.S.C. [read post]
7 Nov 2018, 2:49 pm
The officer said he knows Sr. [read post]
24 May 2020, 7:21 am
SCOV concludes that “a reasonable person in defendant’s circumstances would have felt free to refuse the officer’s request when the officer told him he did not have to agree to get out of his car, making his decision to exit the car voluntary. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 11:55 am
Circumstances allow the SCOV to be more generous. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 10:19 am
A defendant who fails to live up to that duty is said to be “negligent. [read post]
16 Sep 2017, 5:53 pm
And lawyer said he’d go to his office and do so. [read post]
10 Jul 2016, 1:12 pm
This condition is based on a generalized concern, not anything specific to the defendant. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 8:03 am
The Atlanta Law Office of Scott B. [read post]
25 Sep 2016, 5:14 pm
The town board held its required hearing on the emergency order where the defendant acknowledged he did not do anything in response to the health officer’s order. [read post]
17 Dec 2007, 9:50 pm
Question is headed for court [02138 mag] Yes, jury verdicts do sometimes bankrupt defendants, as did this $8 million class action award against a Kansas City car dealer [KC Star, KC Business Journal] Dispute over Burt Neuborne's Holocaust fees is finally over, he'll get $3.1 million [NY Sun] So long as we're only fifty votes behind in the race for this "best general legal blog" honor, we're going to keep nagging you to vote for Overlawyered [if you… [read post]
5 Jan 2021, 8:11 am
Once an obscure legal doctrine, it has become a central focus of activists’ calls for police accountability as recognition of the policy as one of the main doctrines used to defend police officers in cases of police violence has grown. [read post]
5 Feb 2007, 12:00 pm
In a consumer protection case brought by the State of Vermont, the defendant did not raise the issue of whether civil discovery amounted to an unreasonable search in the trial court, so the issue could not be raised on appeal. [read post]
2 Apr 2013, 10:03 am
This sample went the Vermont Department of Health where it was promptly mislabeled and lost. [read post]
