Search for: "Young v. Cross et al" Results 61 - 80 of 123
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Dec 2013, 11:55 am by Bill Marler
  Indeed, a principle and consistent criticism of the USDA E. coli O157:H7 policy is the fact that it has failed to focus on the risks of cross-contamination versus that posed by so-called improper cooking.[33]  With this pathogen, there is ultimately no real margin of error, and the cost of error can be death. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 8:07 pm by Bill Marler
”[29]  As few as twenty organisms have been said to be sufficient to infect a person and, as a result, possibly kill them.[30]  And unlike generic E. coli, the O157:H7 serotype multiplies at temperatures up to 44° Fahrenheit, survives freezing and thawing, is heat resistant, grows at temperatures up to 111° Fahrenheit, resists drying, and can survive exposure to acidic environments.[31] And, finally, to make it even more of a dangerous threat, E. coli O157:H7 bacteria are… [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 1:10 pm by Brian Price
Price, Esquire UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA AUGUSTO COELLO, : as Administrator of the Estate of : DENNIS OMAR ARGUETA, : Plaintiff : CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:13-534 v. : (JUDGE MANNION) FRAC TECH SERVICES, LLC, : et al., : Defendants : : MEMORANDUM Presently before the court is the defendant’s motion to dismiss the plaintiff’s complaint under Fed. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 4:30 am by Steve McConnell
Supreme Court – even Marshall and Brennan had to agree with Rehnquist et al. that the evidence against the hapless criminal defendant should not be suppressed.) [read post]
23 Dec 2012, 3:26 pm by David Cheifetz
Instead, this 40% magnitude of reduction results only in a loss of chance which is not compensable in medical malpractice cases (See: Cottrelle et al v. [read post]