Search for: "f/n/u Brown" Results 61 - 80 of 128
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Oct 2015, 11:52 am by Eugene Volokh
“[I]f it is the speaker’s opinion that gives offense, that consequence is a reason for according it constitutional protection. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 9:07 am by Marty Lederman
It's been almost a year since my last series of posts on the fallout from Hobby Lobby--in particular, on the challenges by nonprofit organizations to the government's augmented religious accommodation. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 12:29 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
In GT Leach Builders LLC v Sapphire VP, LP, No. 13-0497 (Tex. 2015), a complex commercial dispute involving multiple parties and multiple contracts, the Texas Supreme Court recently addressed a number of important arbitration-related issues. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 6:00 am by Bridget Crawford
Brown DorothyABrown Emory Kara Bruce ProfessorKBruce Toledo Matthew Bruckner Prof_Bruckner Howard Sam Brunson smbrnsn Loyola Chicago Ryan Bubb ryan_bubb NYU Neil Buchanan NeilHBuchanan George Washington Trevor Buck trevbuck De Montfort U (UK) Alafair Burke alafairburke Hofstra Beth Burkstrand-Reid beth_burkstrand Nebraska Kylie Burns snailsinbottles Griffith (Australia) Sarah Burstein design_law Oklahoma Michael  Burstein  mburstein  Cardozo Naomi Cahn NaomiCahn… [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 4:44 am by Bridget Crawford
Brown DorothyABrown Emory Kara Bruce ProfessorKBruce Toledo Matthew Bruckner Prof_Bruckner Howard Sam Brunson smbrnsn Loyola Chicago Ryan Bubb ryan_bubb NYU Neil Buchanan NeilHBuchanan George Washington Trevor Buck trevbuck De Montfort U (UK) Alafair Burke alafairburke Hofstra Beth Burkstrand-Reid beth_burkstrand Nebraska Kylie Burns snailsinbottles Griffith (Australia) Sarah Burstein design_law Oklahoma Naomi Cahn NaomiCahn George Washington Gillian Calder gilliancalder Victoria… [read post]
21 Nov 2013, 12:13 pm
  First of all, the position was unprecedented:[N]o court has ever found that a product is “intended for use” or “intended to affect” within the meaning of the FDCA absent manufacturer claims as to that product’s use.Id. at 417 (quoting Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. [read post]