Search for: "vik"
Results 61 - 80
of 286
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Nov 2020, 9:05 am
As Vik Amar, Evan Caminker and I recently wrote on this issue:The ACA’s defenders argue that the obvious and compelling indication of congressional preference is what Congress actually did in 2017. [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 8:02 am
Over at Justia today Vik Amar, Evan Caminker and I provide our own take on available remedies and our own analysis of severability and how it should apply in California v. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 12:05 pm
Vik and I remain confident in our analysis. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 10:32 am
I am writing this post with my colleague Vik Amar.Last night the Supreme Court issued rulings in two election cases. [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 3:55 pm
I appreciate Marty Lederman's comment on the new Justia essay (by Vik Amar, Evan Caminker, and me) that I linked to on whether the ACA insurance mandate is valid without the tax penalty. [read post]
18 Oct 2020, 6:33 am
Vik Amar, Evan Caminker and I offer our analysis of the question before the Supreme Court in California v. [read post]
14 Oct 2020, 8:45 am
Over at Justia, Vik Amar, Evan Caminker and I have posted a new essay on California v. [read post]
10 Oct 2020, 9:38 am
Vik's essay is here for readers with Hein access and here in draft form at SSRN. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 6:30 am
For the Balkinization Symposium on Alexander Keyssar, Why Do We Still Have the Electoral College? [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 6:07 am
Over at Justia, Vik Amar, Evan Caminker and I are doing a multi-part series on California v. [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 9:58 am
The study was done in Norway by Simen Berg Saksvik, Migle Karaliute, Håvard Kallestad, Turid Follestad, Robert Asarnow, Anne Vik, Asta Kristine Håberg, Toril Skandsen and Alexander Olse. [read post]
21 May 2020, 9:07 am
Vik Amar (a leading constitutional law scholar who is now dean at the University of Illinois College of Law) has a pretty detailed analysis (following up on his shorter column that I blogged about last week). [read post]
21 May 2020, 8:07 am
Vik Amar's analysis of the issue today at Justia is essential reading. [read post]
14 May 2020, 2:39 pm
An excellent column from several days ago by Vik Amar, a leading constitutional law scholar and dean at University of Illinois College of Law: The Commerce Clause was the framers' first line of defense against corrosive barriers to trade and economic balkanization among the states. [read post]
4 May 2020, 3:31 pm
Our columnist Dean Vik Amar agrees with their stance, but we think the complaints engage in counterproductive hyperbole. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 12:49 pm
The Court may be "nonchalant," but, I think, this doctrine in particular is unusually weak as a vehicle for protecting "voting rights" under the Constitution.It’s also consistent with the views of Dean Vik Amar and Professor Jason Mazzone looking at this very case. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 6:00 am
Vik Amar and I have a column out today in Verdict/Justia on why the Supreme Court reached the correct decision in its recent per curiam ruling in the Wisconsin election case, Republican National Committee v. [read post]
6 Apr 2020, 10:48 am
The soft skills associated with good legal writing let you see your writing from your reader’s perspective. [read post]
1 Apr 2020, 6:58 am
Claire Cutler, Jothie Rajah, Natasha Affolder, Larry Catá Backer, Prabhakar Singh, Ralf Michaels, Vik KanwarThis title is available for institutional purchase via Cambridge CoreLook Inside Index (230 KB) Marketing Excerpt (123 KB) Front Matter (159 KB) Copyright Information Page (48 KB) Table of Contents (55 KB) [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 2:42 pm
Kyle writes of this picture, which was taken in Vik, Iceland, that “Unseen in Vik, but perhaps suggested by the framing of the photograph, is gale-force wind against which one could scarcely stand upright. [read post]
