Search for: "First M & F Corporation" Results 841 - 860 of 1,503
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Feb 2016, 9:46 am by Daniel Shaviro
”  Indeed, but for patent protection they would likely do it straight out.Consider the U.S. adoption of CFC rules (under subpart F) in 1962, which was followed by the spread of CFC rules elsewhere in the world. [read post]
5 Jan 2018, 3:00 am by Biglaw Investor
It helps smooth out the publication schedule while balancing corporate M&A work. [read post]
30 May 2023, 3:34 pm
  The first touches on the role of "modern slavery" as a wedge regulatory strategy to naturalize what can then become a broader HRDD system. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 12:13 pm by Bob Ambrogi
(Of course, many customers of its tax and corporate segments are also legal professionals, including corporate counsel, who fall under its corporate segment.) [read post]
14 Jul 2018, 6:42 am by Eric Goldman
In this post, I’m largely quoting highlights from 18 cases I had flagged for closer review or possible posting over the past 18 months that instead festered in my inbox for too long. [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 7:37 pm
Surgical Corporation ("USSC") had the rights to enforce the three patents in suit as of March 1999. [read post]
15 Mar 2007, 7:12 am
As Justice Ginsburg explained in O’Hagan, “[F]ull disclosure forecloses liability under the misappropriation theory … [I]f the fiduciary discloses to the source that he plans to trade on the nonpublic information, there is no [insider trading liability].” *** All that said, I’m sympathetic to Winans’ basic point that we should reconceive of insider trading as an offense based on theft, not fraud. [read post]