Search for: "Alexander Warren" Results 81 - 100 of 296
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Feb 2020, 6:13 am
Posted by Gail Weinstein, Steven Epstein, and Warren S. de Wied, Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson LLP, on Monday, February 17, 2020 Tags: Board independence, Boards of Directors, Controlling shareholders, Delaware cases, Delaware law, Merger litigation, Mergers & acquisitions, Uber Financial Institution Developments Posted by Edward D. [read post]
30 Dec 2019, 3:02 am by Walter Olson
Elizabeth Warren (D–Mass.) thinks American businesses should not have. [read post]
29 Dec 2019, 9:05 pm by Series of Essays
The Warren Campaign’s Antitrust Proposals March 25, 2019 | Herbert Hovenkamp, University of Pennsylvania One of Senator Elizabeth Warren’s proposals is similar to the Trump Administration’s strategy of protecting coal at the expense of sustainable energy sources. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 12:15 pm by Ronald Collins
  Question: As a matter of originalist jurisprudence, do you think Alexander Bickel’s memorandum for Justice Felix Frankfurter in Brown v. [read post]
19 Nov 2019, 9:19 am by Keith E. Whittington
In Federalist #65, Alexander Hamilton noted that even an elected government would need an impeachment power to address “the abuse or violation of some public trust. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 6:09 am by Emma Broches, Julia Solomon-Strauss
., mostly to be arrested and charged (the 15th was Warren Christopher Clark, on whom we reported at the time). [read post]
18 Oct 2019, 7:00 am by Race to the Bottom
(Alexander Kraik, Vermont Law Review) Investors are now seeing the importance in non-financial information for informed decision making and the general public has become more concerned with the composition of boards while putting more pressure on companies to increase women representation on boards. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Writing in defense of most of the work of the Warren Court—which had been subject to relentless criticism even by its political allies—Ely explained that it is wrong to conceive of judicial review as necessarily undemocratic or even “counter-majoritarian” (as Alexander Bickel had conceived it).Ely explained that often judicial review can be “representation reinforcing” by striking down laws or practices that are themselves undemocratic. [read post]
26 Sep 2019, 7:36 am by Ezra Rosser
Louis Blake Strode, Executive Director, Arch City Defenders Jovana Renteria, Puente Human Rights Movement Alana Greer, Co-Director, Community Justice Project Amanda Alexander, Executive Director, Detroit Justice Center (invited) Thomas Mariadason, Deputy Director, Asian Law Caucus (invited) Montague Simmons, Local Justice Director, Movement Voter Project Phil Agnew, Co-Founder, Dream Defenders Scott Roberts, Senior Director of Criminal Justice Campaigns, Color of Change [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
For example, Chief Justice Warren’s deferential approach to Congress in United States v. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 2:58 am by Walter Olson
Choice between federal and state courts implicates fundamental questions of fairness [Eric Alexander, Drug and Device Law on Supreme Court certiorari petition in Pfizer v. [read post]
12 Jul 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Elizabeth Warren and Michael Bennet have called for a strict lifetime ban on lawmakers lobbying. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
Kloppenberg, the Charles Warren Professor of American History at Harvard University. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
 The crucial point is that Kersch has almost nothing to say about these debates, other than noting that it is an important category mistake to view Kurland, Wechsler, or Alexander Bickel as "conservatives," unless that is simply used to refer to anyone who expressed doubts about exercises of judicial power by the Warren Court. [read post]
14 May 2019, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Although there was no dissent from Chief Justice Warren Burger’s 1974 opinion holding that President Nixon lacked a blanket executive privilege, the lack of any underlying constitutional text enables Congress and President Trump to make wildly divergent claims about the proper scope of the privilege.If you think that history provides concrete guidance in structure-and-history cases of the sort lacking in cases involving unenumerated individual rights like abortion and same-sex… [read post]