Search for: "American Alternative Insurance v. American Protection Insurance"
Results 81 - 100
of 512
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Mar 2008, 12:16 pm
Nelson v. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 8:17 am
” Specifically, Section 1563 (the second 1563, as there are three in the PPACA) provides: “The term ‘Exchange’ means an American Health Benefit Exchange established under section 1311 of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. [read post]
17 Oct 2010, 11:11 am
(Randy Barnett) In an earlier post, Orin compares the current challenges to the constitutionality of the individual insurance mandate to debates on this blog over the case of McDonald v. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 5:50 am
Nevertheless, the idea of protecting economic liberty through limitations on federal power has a long history in debates in American constitutional law. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 6:14 am
June Medical Services v. [read post]
3 Jul 2019, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court held in Gobeille v. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 2:06 pm
Those alternative interpretations cannot be reconciled with the statute. [read post]
24 Aug 2022, 5:01 am
After West Virginia v. [read post]
Seventh Circuit Declines To Address The EEOC’s Challenge To The Legality Of Employer’s Wellness Plan
29 Jan 2017, 9:20 am
” In EEOC v. [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 8:37 pm
Obergefell v. [read post]
27 Jul 2008, 3:27 pm
L. 77 (1791), to become widely accepted in American courts by the middle of the 19th century, see, e.g., Day v. [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 6:42 pm
Co. v. [read post]
25 Aug 2017, 4:00 am
The alternative business structures (ABS investors owning law firms)[1] debate is a very live one in Ontario, and will be throughout Canada, depending upon what the Law Society of Upper Canada (LSUC) at Toronto’s Osgoode Hall decides. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 1:50 pm
” Town of Greece v. [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 6:04 am
At Cato at Liberty, Ilya Shapiro discusses the amicus brief that Cato filed recently in the challenges to state bans on same-sex marriage, in which it “urge[s] the Court to reverse the Sixth Circuit’s decision and finally fulfill the Constitution’s promise of equal protection under law to millions of gay Americans and their children. [read post]
18 Oct 2008, 7:30 pm
PHRs may be the disruptive technology providing an alternative to a complex system of interconnected interoperable health information systems, often among health care stakeholders who have conflicting and competitive interests. [read post]
26 Apr 2016, 8:31 am
Wednesday’s Supreme Court ruling in Bank Markazi v. [read post]
17 Jan 2013, 7:30 pm
Or a state prohibition on private insurance providers including coverage for abortion services? [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 1:07 pm
Filburn and Gonzales v. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 6:37 pm
It is therefore essential that individuals who work in the sharing economy be considered common-law employees for retirement purposes under the control test established in Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co. v. [read post]
