Search for: "Apotex" Results 81 - 100 of 1,051
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Feb 2020, 4:00 am by Martin Kratz
Pfizer Canada ULC, 2020 FC 1, at para. 48. [12] See Free World Trust, supra, at paragraph 13; Apotex Inc v Wellcome Foundation Ltd, 2002 SCC 77 at paragraph 37, [2002] 4 SCR 153; AstraZeneca Canada Inc v Apotex Inc, 2017 SCC 36 at paragraph 39, [2017] 1 SCR 943 [13] See Free World Trust, supra, at paragraphs 33–43; applied in Seedlings Life Science Ventures, LLC v. [read post]
5 Feb 2020, 4:00 am by Administrator
The Sheriff (Regional Municipality of York), 2020 ONSC 469 (CanLII) [91] In Apotex, at para. 118, the Federal Court of Appeal stated that “denying mandamus appears to arise in instances where potential health and safety risks to the public are perceived to outweigh an individual’s right to pursue personal or economic interests”. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 5:00 am by silverman_admin
Apotex Corp also issued a precautionary recall. [read post]
15 Oct 2019, 2:09 am by Courtenay C. Brinckerhoff
Apotex, Inc., the Federal Circuit reversed the PTAB’s determination that a Tarceva® patent was invalid as obvious because the decision was not supported by a reasonable expectation of success. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 4:45 am by Levin & Perconti
Three drugmakers – Apotex, Sandoz and GlaxoSmithKline – have recalled generic versions. [read post]
30 Aug 2019, 6:31 am
Apotex, Inc [here], the Federal Court of Appeal embraced the US/French approach. [read post]
28 Jul 2019, 8:51 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Any planning of a public calendar can be challenging in a diverse and multicultural society. [read post]
29 May 2019, 12:22 pm
  If the defendant "knew the risk and decided it was best not to remove it" then that is a factor in favor of maintaining the status quo and granting an injunction (see Aldous LJ in SmithKline Beecham v Apotex [2003] FSR 31 at [40]; see also Arnold J in Warner-Lambert v Actavis [2015] EWHC 72 at [133]). [read post]
14 May 2019, 11:24 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Apotex, Inc., 480F.3d 1348, 1361 (Fed. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 10:59 am by Camilla Hrdy
Apotex Inc. (2017).According to Professor Siebrasse, pre-abolishment, Canadian utility doctrine effectively had "two branches": (1) the "traditional utility requirement," which is similar to U.S. law's, and requires merely a "scintilla" of utility; and (2) "the Promise Doctrine. [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 10:37 am by Lebowitz & Mzhen
” The recalled medication is Drospirenone and Ethinyl Estradiol Tablets, USP, and is manufactured by Apotex Corporation. [read post]