Search for: "BAA"
Results 81 - 100
of 317
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Dec 2013, 6:01 pm
On average, I've probably charged around $5,000 to $10,000 for a worked-over set of policies (including adaption to the client's specific needs, assisting with risk analysis, adding in forms for BAAs and NoPPs, etc.). [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 10:14 am
While BAAs are still needed, take careful consideration that you don't waive the attorney-client [read post]
24 Nov 2009, 4:14 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Pacan & Ors, R. v [2009] EWCA Crim 2436 (16 October 2009) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Transview Properties Ltd v City Site Properties Ltd [2009] EWCA Civ 1255 (24 November 2009) Widlake v BAA Ltd [2009] EWCA Civ 1256 (23 November 2009) High Court (Queen's Bench Division) The Lord Chancellor v Michael [...] [read post]
27 Sep 2016, 9:03 am
Why did Care New England Pay $400,000 for Failing to Update Internal BAAs? [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 11:56 am
I wonder if these vendors are subject to BAAs or other privacy and confidentiality restrictions. [read post]
10 Oct 2016, 11:45 am
The Lesson of Care New England: Even if the breach isn't caused by it, the fact that you failed to manage your BAAs can cost you almost half a million dollars (OK, $400,000; I was telling some folks at a conference today it was $500,000, but I mis-remembered the amount, obviously). [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 2:15 pm
Recently, the United States Patent and Trademark Office’s Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (“TTAB”) denied an opposition, by Boston Athletic Association (“BAA”), to the registration of the mark MARATHON MONDAY by Velocity, LLC (“Velocity”).[1] Velocity filed an application for the mark MARATHON MONDAY for use in connection with “clothing, namely tops, bottoms, headwear, sweatshirts, sweat […] The post Opposition to trademark… [read post]
21 Apr 2017, 11:25 am
Center for Children's Digestive Health, in suburban Chicago, agreed to pay a $31,000 fine for failing to have a BAA in place with its document management and destruction company, FileFax. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 12:03 pm
Baas [read post]
20 Jan 2013, 5:54 pm
But as long as you have an existing BAA in place on the publication date (Janaury 25, 2013) that meets current HIPAA standards (pre-Omnibus Rule standards), that agreement will be good for up to a year after the compliance date (September 22, 2014), unless the agreement is renewed [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 8:16 am
ISU apparently had a BAA with the contractor, but the OCR investigation determined that they hadn't done a risk assessment recently enough. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 8:55 am
Drummond, I advise a company that routinely enters into BAAs; in doing so my colleagues and I try to limit reporting requirements for security incidents that do not rise to the level of breaches [read post]
7 Dec 2022, 11:25 am
As a covered entity, your first task is to make sure you have BAAs in place with your vendors. [read post]
21 Apr 2017, 11:25 am
Center for Children's Digestive Health, in suburban Chicago, agreed to pay a $31,000 fine for failing to have a BAA in place with its document management and destruction company, FileFax. [read post]
24 May 2024, 2:16 pm
The BAA creates a preference for domestic products when the government purchases supplies. [read post]
28 Dec 2012, 11:05 am
Hounslow owned the layby, which adjoined land owned by BAA. [read post]
28 Dec 2012, 11:05 am
Hounslow owned the layby, which adjoined land owned by BAA. [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 2:33 am
Carol Barbone and Brian Ross (on behalf of Stop Stansted Expansion), and (1) The Secretary of State for Transport (2) The Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government, and (1) BAA Limited and Stansted Airport Limited (2) Uttlesford District Council and others. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 2:06 am
After a grueling nine hours of deep sleep and the miraculous epiphany that reindeer is tastier than I ever would have thought and steak Fiorenza may be the finest dinner ever, I’m back. [read post]
21 Oct 2021, 3:58 am
When asked by a senator who gave her the authority to make up her own rules, Catherine Lhamon smugly responded that the Senate did when it confirmed her. [read post]
