Search for: "Barnett Personal Property, Specifically"
Results 81 - 100
of 106
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jul 2012, 5:46 pm
Within the known rules of the game the individual is free to pursue his personal ends and desires, certain that the powers of government will not be used deliberately to frustrate his efforts. [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 5:25 am
In some cases, these specific complaints account for provisions eventually included in the Constitution and Bill of Rights. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 7:34 am
UPDATE: In case anyone thinks it is a stretch to characterize slavery as an economic system, here are the specific rights that Republicans in the Thirty-Ninth Congress sought to protect in the Civil Rights Act of 1866, which was enacted under the authority of Section 2 of the 13th Amendment, which prohibited “slavery” and “involuntary servitude”: the right . . . to make and enforce contracts, to sue, be parties, and give evidence, to inherit,… [read post]
8 Apr 2012, 2:11 am
He said: “I would have a personal view and I would say to whoever I was talking to: ‘I think this’. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 7:22 am
The amicus brief did not offer any justification or even explanation for the distinction, but the implicit reasoning is easy to infer: Public money is different from private property or liberty -- even public money to which a private person is allegedly entitled. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 9:45 am
Barnette of 1943. [read post]
21 Jan 2012, 4:32 pm
But the (dangerous) power to confiscate property in the form of taxes or by eminent domain is not the same as the power to make someone alter their legal relations with another person, which is what contracts do. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 5:10 am
”) The Fifth Amendment bars the commandeering of private property. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 3:57 am
KPMG Discovery Dispute - bit.ly/yYYjg1 (Evan Koblentz) Non-Party eDiscovery Obligations in New York – A Question of Proportionality - bit.ly/zqgvUc (K&L Gates) Recovering E-Discovery Costs: A Potential Trend - bit.ly/xZqal1 (Cooley) Score One for Plaintiffs in Battle Over Discoverability of Facebook - bit.ly/wyIp0x (Calli Varner) TalkingPoint: Legal Challenges In Cloud Archiving And eDiscovery – bit.ly/z1Hcoy (Michelle Reyes, Neal Lawson, Wayne Matus) Taxation of eDiscovery Costs in… [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 2:55 pm
This is a central claim of New Originalists like Randy Barnett, Larry Solum, and myself. [read post]
26 Nov 2011, 5:23 am
Barnette (children forced to say the pledge of allegiance), the U.S. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 12:41 pm
Specifically, the policy covered "direct physical loss to property" caused by enumerated hazards, including theft. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 12:41 pm
Specifically, the policy covered "direct physical loss to property" caused by enumerated hazards, including theft. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 5:29 am
Can mitigating circumstances make a person “innocent of the death penalty”? [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 6:02 am
2011 WL 1259650, at *3 (“Plaintiffs specifically link Mr. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 8:03 pm
Liens -- Mechanic's lien may not be imposed against condominium association encumbering condominium units for amount owed for cleaning, maintenance, concierge, and security services -- Mechanic's lien statute is to protect those who have provided labor and materials for the improvement of property, and services provided by plaintiff did not improve property -- Plaintiff does not have independent right to claim of lien under section 718.121, Florida Statutes PARC CENTRAL… [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 6:47 am
Property rights are rights in things. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 12:05 pm
Specifically, the CFPB can issue rules making unlawful any acts that it defines as “unfair, deceptive or abusive acts. [read post]
28 Mar 2010, 1:22 pm
There are many states that do a far better job than the federal government of protecting economic liberties, property rights, civil liberties, and other freedoms important to libertarians. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 7:16 pm
The Administrator is hereby providing public notice of this proposed Consent Agreement and Final Order (CAFO), and providing an opportunity for interested persons to comment on the CWA, EPCRA, RCRA, and CAA portions of this Consent Agreement, in accordance with CWA sections 309(g)(4)(A) and 311(b)(6) [read post]
