Search for: "Brian Tamanaha"
Results 81 - 100
of 568
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Oct 2013, 1:55 pm
For institutions, that would have big financial and educational implications that have been only hinted at in the debate.I believe Brian Tamanaha has an illuminating discussion of this issue in his book Failing Law Schools. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 8:18 am
Continue reading »Follow Above the Law on Twitter or become a fan on Facebook.Tags: Alex Holt, Boalt Hall, Brian Tamanaha, Brian Z. [read post]
31 Jul 2013, 7:20 am
Continue reading »Follow Above the Law on Twitter or become a fan on Facebook.Tags: Adam Smith Esq, Am Law, Am Law 100, AmLaw, AmLaw 100, AmLaw 200, Ask the Experts, Biglaw, Brian Tamanaha, Bruce MacEwen, CAGR, Dewey & LeBoeuf, Frank McIntyre, Great Recession, Janet Stanton, Law Schools, Michael Simkovic, Partner Issues, Partner Profits, survivorship bias, The Great Reset of 2008 [read post]
31 Jul 2013, 4:17 am
Following up on yesterday's post, Leiter's Reflections on The Economic Value of a Law Degree: Brian Tamanaha (Washington U.), Leiter's Contradictory Conclusion: S&M have issued a torrent of words in response to my various criticisms, but what they have not justified is their earnings comparison between the bottom 25th percentile... [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 1:12 pm
Typical Brian Leiter. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 1:19 am
Michael Simkovic (Seton Hall), Brian Tamanaha’s Straw Men (Part 4): We Would Have to Be Off by 85 ercent For Our Basic Conclusion to be Incorrect: Brian Tamanaha’s latest blog post has been hailed by Stephen Diamond and others as a major concession. [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 10:00 am
Brian Tamanaha has conceded that indeed Simkovic and McIntyre are right about the positive... [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 9:56 am
Update: Brian Tamanaha’s latest blog post has been hailed by Stephen Diamond and others as a major concession. [read post]
27 Jul 2013, 2:32 pm
Some Thoughts on ‘The Economic Value of a Law Degree’. [read post]
26 Jul 2013, 9:55 am
BT Claim 3: 16 years of data is not enough “S&M’s bold assertion that their 16-year study establishes valid ‘historical norms’ on law degree earnings... [read post]
25 Jul 2013, 9:23 am
BT Claim 2: Using more years of data would reduce the earnings premium BT Quote: There is no doubt that including 1992 to 1995 in... [read post]
25 Jul 2013, 9:14 am
Here are links to the counterpunching highlights, more or less in order: Michael Simkovic, Brian Tamanaha Says We Should Look at the Below Average Outcomes (And We Did) Brian Tamanaha, , Brian Tamanaha, How “The Million Dollar Law Degree” Study Systematically Overstates Value: Three Choices that Skewed the Results Michael Simkovic, Brian Tamanaha’s Straw Men (Overview) Brian Tamanaha, , How… [read post]
24 Jul 2013, 5:16 pm
Most recently, WUSTL’s Brian Tamanaha, author of Failing Law Schools, went after the study on Balkinization arguing it systematically overstates the value of a law degree and understates the risk of assuming debt to obtain a law degree. [read post]
24 Jul 2013, 9:58 am
And he gets extremely detailed in taking on Brian Tamanaha's criticism here and here. [read post]
24 Jul 2013, 6:45 am
Michael Simkovic has posted his first two responses to Brian Tamanaha's post from yesterday. [read post]
24 Jul 2013, 5:17 am
BT Claim: We could have used more historical data without introducing continuity and other methodological problems BT quote: “Although SIPP was redesigned in 1996, there... [read post]
24 Jul 2013, 5:01 am
Brian Tamanaha previously told Inside Higher Education that our research only looked at average earnings premiums and did not consider the low end of the... [read post]
18 Jul 2013, 10:29 am
See for example, Brian Tamanaha Says We Should Look at the Below Average Outcomes (And We Did). [read post]
18 Jul 2013, 7:09 am
Brian Tamanaha has often argued that "getting a law degree outside of top law school – and especially at bottom law schools –is a risky proposition." [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 11:00 am
: Brian Tamanaha (Washington U.), The Problems with Income Based Repayment, and the Charge of Elitism: Responses to Schrag and Chambliss, 26 Geo. [read post]
