Search for: "Brown v. South Carolina, State of"
Results 81 - 100
of 304
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 May 2024, 4:00 am
Thomas says the following about Brown v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 5:00 am
Pa. 1985) (can’t tell what state’s law); Seiden v. [read post]
25 Oct 2021, 5:01 am
Arkansas, Iowa, Oklahoma, South Dakota and Tennessee all passed statutes increasing the maximum penalty to one year in jail for people who obstruct sidewalks and streets. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 4:08 am
” Briefly: At The Economist’s Democracy in America Blog, Steven Mazie discusses various challenges to state restrictions on abortion and observes that, with its order on Monday letting stand a lower-court ruling that blocked North Carolina’s ultrasound from going into effect, “the Supreme Court has effectively foreclosed ultrasound laws requiring doctor explanations in Maryland, North Carolina, South Carolina, Virginia and West… [read post]
4 Jul 2016, 5:00 am
Hobby Lobby, 67 South Carolina Law Review 73-97 (2015).Emilia Justyna Powell, Islamic Law States and the Authority of the International Court of Justice: Territorial Sovereignty and Diplomatic Immunity, 79 Law & Contemporary Problems 209-236 (2016).Evan C. [read post]
6 Oct 2009, 4:58 am
Brown v. [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 7:16 am
The Defendants lived in South Carolina. [read post]
18 Jan 2008, 11:44 am
Only those in Florida, Oklahoma, South Carolina, and Texas contain a possible death penalty for non-homicidal child rape. [read post]
3 Aug 2013, 7:44 am
Julius graduated from high school in May 1954, the very month the United States Supreme Court announced its landmark ruling in Brown v. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 10:02 am
There’s the path of Brown v. [read post]
8 May 2013, 9:44 am
Meanwhile, another federal District Court, in South Carolina, had vacated the Rule in its entirety in April 2012. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 8:41 am
Anders Walker explores how three moderate Southern governors formulated masked resistance in the wake of Brown v. [read post]
19 Jun 2013, 6:45 pm
” Brown v. [read post]
28 May 2019, 8:13 am
In Himsel v. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 10:58 am
The 24 states in which the order applies include: West Virginia, North Dakota, Georgia, Iowa, Alabama, Alaska, Arkansas, Florida, Indiana, Kansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, New Hampshire, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Utah, Virginia, and Wyoming. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 10:58 am
The 24 states in which the order applies include: West Virginia, North Dakota, Georgia, Iowa, Alabama, Alaska, Arkansas, Florida, Indiana, Kansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, New Hampshire, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Utah, Virginia, and Wyoming. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 10:58 am
The 24 states in which the order applies include: West Virginia, North Dakota, Georgia, Iowa, Alabama, Alaska, Arkansas, Florida, Indiana, Kansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, New Hampshire, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Utah, Virginia, and Wyoming. [read post]
21 Apr 2021, 1:53 pm
South Carolina, 409 U.S. 524 (1973). [read post]
9 Apr 2020, 9:01 pm
American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees and South Dakota v. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 1:04 pm
And, as we have reported, a federal court in the District of Columbia is also considering a joint employer test in Browning Ferris v. [read post]
