Search for: "CAMPBELL v. HOLDER" Results 81 - 100 of 166
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jan 2015, 3:45 am
However: (1) the social benefit in having a truthful depiction of King's actual words would be much greater than the copyright owners' loss, and (2) it is not required that all four fair use factors weigh in favour of a finding of fair use, as recent judgments, eg Cariou v Prince [here] or Seltzer v Green Day [here], demonstrate. [read post]
13 Nov 2014, 12:02 pm by Kevin Smith, J.D.
 Although the publishers assert that this is the meaning of the Supreme Court’s ruling in Campbell v. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 5:22 am by Kevin Smith, J.D.
  It is a key and indispensable component of our system of copyright, as the Supreme Court has reminded us many times (E.g., Campbell v. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 3:09 am by SHG
But when they speak of gravity knives today, it’s a very different animal, as revealed in Bronx Supreme Court Justice Troy Webber’s opinion in People v. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 12:49 pm
The agreements between collecting societies and some content sharing platforms do not, as of now, secure these practices " (Part. 1 p. 36).French Law “Awkward” at Grasping Transformative WorksAs explained by the Report, the term “transformative” originated in U.S. fair use case law, particularly the Supreme Court Campbell v. [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 4:00 am by Jeff Welty
UNC and Wake Forest are tied for number 31, while Campbell is tied for number 131 121 [thanks to a reader for calling this error to my attention, and my apologies to the good folks at Campbell]. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 8:09 am
  Fair use is a doctrine that permits use of copyrighted material in a parodical work without permission from the rights holder." [read post]
8 Feb 2014, 4:49 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Increasingly doing doctrinal work—Campbell, then Blanch v. [read post]