Search for: "COST v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION" Results 81 - 100 of 1,007
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 May 2023, 12:30 am by David Pocklington
Option 4 will cause greater harm to the significance of the church as a Grade II* listed building than Option 2; and that greater harm cannot be justified by the costs savings which would follow from the adoption of Option 4. [read post]
23 Apr 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
Disclosure and trust lower the cost of capital for issuers and raise returns for investors. [read post]
22 Apr 2023, 7:16 pm
  The global press has, of course, been following the battles between the Biden Administration and Congress over the extent to which the Federal Government may permit pension plan fiduciaries to consider ESG in their investment decisions. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 4:41 pm by INFORRM
It is not limited to high-profile social media platforms. [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 7:35 am by Cyberleagle
It is not limited to high-profile social media platforms. [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 9:05 pm by Victoria Hawekotte
Supreme Court’s decision in West Virginia v. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 2:22 am by INFORRM
It does this by protecting newspapers from paying claimants’ costs in claims brought against them, where the claimant could instead have used low-cost arbitration. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 1:25 am by INFORRM
On the same day, O’Callaghan J made an order for costs in the case of Watkins v Tatana [2023] FCA 248, in favour of the Respondents. [read post]
12 Mar 2023, 9:31 am by Dave Maass
First, the photos showed they were outside the city's security secretariat building. [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 2:02 pm by Chris Skelton
First, Medicare is available to people who are 65 or older and eligible for Social Security benefits, as well as certain other groups. [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 9:05 pm by Bryn Hines
Supreme Court’s decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 7:28 am by Unknown
According to Conwell, his first fund raised money from a diverse group of investors via Rule 506(c) of Regulation D and a social media campaign (Rule 506(c) allows for general solicitation in some instances). [read post]
9 Feb 2023, 9:05 pm by renholding
For example, some state officials banned the consideration of social or political interests when making investment decisions for state pension funds or have redirected state funds away from large asset managers because these officials claim the companies are prioritising political and social agendas over duties to clients. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 5:39 am
A little spice was added by the indulgence in the rhetoric of setting up of improbable targets followed by solemn pledges of defense (social security and medicare for example). [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 2:38 pm
But it is also in part a reflection, effectively, of what might be preferences for mitigation-remediation (or otherwise exit if the costs of prevention exceed the anticipated vale of an activity), at least indifference as between the strategies as a function of expected value. [read post]