Search for: "Companies A, B & C" Results 81 - 100 of 12,812
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Apr 2024, 11:33 am by admin
This delay was largely influenced by the interests of Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (MetLife) and other asbestos mining and product manufacturing companies. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 11:28 pm by Adeline Chong
As detailed in the accompanying Supreme Court Practice Directions (‘SCPD’), a claimant making an application under this ground has to establish the usual common law requirements that: ‘(a) there is a good arguable case that there is a sufficient nexus to Singapore; (b) Singapore is forum conveniens; and (c) there is a serious issue to be tried on the merits of the claim. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 1:28 pm by Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP
The company’s stock price fell approximately 41%, and Moab Partners sued Macquarie and various officers and directors alleging, among other things, violation of the general antifraud provisions under the federal securities laws, Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 3:10 pm by Kevin
LAPF is one of two exclusive holders of intellectual property rights pertaining to trademarks, copyrights and other licensed indicia for (a) the Los Angeles Police Department Badge; (b) the Los Angeles Police Department Uniform; (c) the LAPD motto “To Protect and Serve”; and (d) the word “LAPD” as an acronym/abbreviation for the Los Angeles Police Department (collectively, the “LAPD IP”). [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 2:51 pm by Herrman & Herrman, P.L.L.C.
If you follow these simple rules you should have no legal issues with your furry pet and they should keep you and your family company for years to come. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
The Activision decision also addressed a challenge to the corporation’s compliance with the requirement of Section 251(c) to provide stockholders with notice of the merger. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 10:06 pm by Marcel Pemsel
The EUIPO rejected the application due to lack of distinctiveness (Art. 7(1)(b) EUTMR). [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 2:04 pm by John Stigi and Kristin Housh
 Put differently, if a company elects to speak, it must tell the whole truth (or at least “information necessary to ensure that the [affirmative] statements made are clear and complete”); but a company’s silence on an issue is not securities fraud under Rule 10b-5(b), even if the company is otherwise duty-bound to disclose. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 10:00 am by Ortiz Law Firm
If you do not receive all the documents you request within a reasonable time, you can file a subsection (b)(2), (a)(3), and § 502(c) lawsuit seeking the statutory penalty. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 8:01 am by Scott H. Kimpel
The bill applies to “payment stablecoins,” which are defined to include a crypto asset (A) that is, or is designed to be, used as a means of payment or settlement; (B) the issuer of which (i) is obligated to convert, redeem or repurchase for a fixed amount of United States dollars or (ii) represents, or creates the reasonable expectation, that the crypto asset will maintain a stable value relative to the value of a fixed amount of United States dollars; and (C) that is… [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:56 am by ngritacco
Non-Exempt Companies NY LLCs that do not fall within one of the twenty-three exempt entity types must disclose the following information for each of their beneficial owners and applicants (as defined in the Federal CTA): Full legal name, Date of birth, Current home or business street address, and Unique identifying number from one of the following: (a) an unexpired passport, (b) an unexpired state driver’s license, or (c) an unexpired identification card or document… [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am by Bernard Bell
Many state and local officials host social media sites and use them to converse with followers on matters related to their governmental responsibilities, among other things.[1]  Not surprisingly, many choose to block from their sites certain members of the public they find disagreeable.[2] Being disagreeable, or at least in disagreement with such actions, blocked followers sometimes sue alleging that their exclusion violates the First Amendment.[3]  One of the most notable examples was a… [read post]