Affirming the administrative law judge's decision, the Board found that the Respondent is a successor employer to Crockett and Buss and violated Section 8(a)(5) and (1) of the Act by refusing to recognize and bargain with Teamsters Local 80 as the exclusive collective-bargaining representative of its unit employees, and unilaterally changing the employees' terms and conditions of employment without notice to and bargaining with the Union; and violated Section 8(a)(1) by informing… [read post]