Search for: "Denis Fritz" Results 81 - 100 of 214
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Oct 2013, 4:56 am
But, after deeming 'incorrectly' that any adjournment would have to be approved by a 75 percent majority and then giving votes to those who should not have voted - including directors Brian Bell, Elvis Dube and Fritz Ackermann - the adjournment was denied and the deal with Trini was approved. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 9:02 am by Rick St. Hilaire
The Response argues that the federal district court--not the Court of International Trade--is the proper venue to litigate a Cultural Property Implementation Act (CPIA) forfeiture; that due process was not denied to the claimant, Jean Combe Fritz; and that the forfeiture complaints are legally sufficient.The claimant's lawyers last month argued that the Court of International Trade (CIT) should hear the forfeiture case. [read post]
18 Aug 2013, 4:00 am by Rick St. Hilaire
In answer to the government's initial complaint, he denies "that the CPIA [Convention on Cultural Property Implementation Act] applies, that the items are Pre-Columbian or Colonial, and that Peru is the source country." [read post]
1 May 2013, 12:59 am by Veronika Gaertner
Both the result as well as the legal reasoning must be criticized for the excessive requirements concerning the information on legal remedies and the wrongfully denied cure of non-compliance with minimum standards. [read post]
2 Feb 2013, 2:19 pm by Jack Pringle
Fritz, upholding a statute maintaining "windfall" retirement benefits to some retirees but not others was valid because it accomplished the statute's purpose in helping to maintain retirement system). [read post]
2 Feb 2013, 2:19 pm by Jack Pringle
Fritz, upholding a statute maintaining "windfall" retirement benefits to some retirees but not others was valid because it accomplished the statute's purpose in helping to maintain retirement system). [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 3:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
  WC argued that the 1999 and 2000 tax returns, which MCC signed, together with other financial records estopped him from denying WC's 25% membership interest; that the brothers had "agreed" that WC would be a 25% member regardless of any imbalance in cash contributions; that the fact that his investment in the LLC was part of a 1031 exchange was immaterial to the acquisition of his membership interest; that WC never withdrew his initial capital… [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 3:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
Driscoll, denies dismissal of Piroozian's claims for withheld distributions and for an accounting, holding that they are not in the nature of derivative claims. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 3:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
Driscoll, denies dismissal of Piroozian's claims for withheld distributions and for an accounting, holding that they are not in the nature of derivative claims. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 3:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
  The Framed Issue Hearing In January 2010, the court denied the company's request for a preliminary injunction against Marc Werner for alleged violation of his non-compete and other restrictive covenants (read decision here). [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 3:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
Peter initially opposed the petition, denying that grounds existed for dissolution and contesting his sister's standing as a 50% shareholder based on his mother's alleged incapacity at the time she executed the stock trust. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 3:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
Peter initially opposed the petition, denying that grounds existed for dissolution and contesting his sister's standing as a 50% shareholder based on his mother's alleged incapacity at the time she executed the stock trust. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 3:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
Boussi where the court denied standing to a petitioner who omitted his alleged stock ownership interest from his prior bankruptcy filing. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 3:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
Boussi where the court denied standing to a petitioner who omitted his alleged stock ownership interest from his prior bankruptcy filing. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 3:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
Fee, 2012 NY Slip Op 51133(U) (Sup Ct Westchester County June 7, 2012), denying a defense motion to dismiss a complaint seeking common law dissolution of a large, family-owned firm, likely sets a new baseline for analysis of common law dissolution claims at the pleading stage. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 3:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
The Lower Court's Decision Denying Summary Judgment  In April 2011, Antonini moved before Manhattan Commercial Division Justice Jeffrey K. [read post]