Search for: "Doe v. South Carolina"
Results 81 - 100
of 1,882
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jul 2023, 10:15 am
Judge Tyson favorably cited the Supreme Court of South Carolina’s refusal in State v. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 7:36 am
1 M and M Corp. of South Carolina v. [read post]
12 Jul 2023, 8:05 am
It does not. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 11:00 am
Approximately 25 years later, in Grutter v. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 5:55 am
However, in Grutter v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 9:15 pm
Uriel-Charles discussed the 1960 Supreme Court case Gomillion v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 3:16 pm
Consider the Court’s 1978 decision in Bakke (Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 1:34 pm
Bollinger (2003) and Fisher v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 7:49 am
Uni- versity of North Carolina et al., on certiorari before judgment to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 7:49 am
Uni- versity of North Carolina et al., on certiorari before judgment to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 3:52 am
Accordingly, we conclude the application of South Carolina law is appropriate and that the internal affairs doctrine does not bar our review of this issue. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 6:30 am
Before there was Jefferson Davis and Alexander Stephens, there was John Calhoun and the other South Carolina nullificationists; before South Carolina, there was a New England that refused to co-operate with the federal government even in a time of war with a powerful foreign empire; and before New England there was Virginia and Kentucky’s resistance to the Alien and Sedition Acts, supported by Jefferson and Madison’s risky intellectual grapplings with… [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 6:30 am
Calhoun and other proponents of the “South Carolina doctrine” that undergirded the Nullification Crisis of 1832-33. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 6:30 am
Fritz argues that the Court’s ruling that the state of Georgia could be sued in federal court by a citizen of South Carolina “generated widespread state interposition to resist the Court’s seemingly broad interpretation of a constitutional clause and ultimately resulted in the Eleventh Amendment. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 6:30 am
And it really does not matter whether the reader is “pro-state” or more a devotee of what was accurately called, by many opponents of the Constitution, a “consolidated” national government with basically plenary powers to pass any and all legislation deemed in the national interest. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 8:17 am
Lyons v. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm
In Allen v. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 11:48 am
As I wrote earlier this week, the descendants of plaintiffs in a companion case from South Carolina believe that Brown should be renamed Briggs v. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 7:46 am
The prosecution offered evidence of defendant’s 2005 conviction in South Carolina for grand larceny. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 6:05 am
Recently, the Supreme Court agreed to hear an appeal from a lower court’s ruling that a district in South Carolina was created through illegal racial gerrymandering. [read post]
