Search for: "Does 1 - 47" Results 81 - 100 of 4,405
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Feb 2007, 9:15 am
(For another example of a court rejecting discovery requests in the face of a 230 defense, see Doe v. [read post]
15 May 2017, 6:56 am by Eric Goldman
1-800 Contacts doesn’t directly respond to this allegation but it tacitly admits it: (1) “1-800 Contacts does not try to compete solely on price with the lowest-priced discount retailers, like Costco and various online-only retailers”, (2) “1-800 Contacts makes substantial investments in customer service and the purchasing experience,” and (3) 1-800 Contacts spends a lot on TV advertising. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 2:10 am by Roel van Woudenberg
The Board does, unfortunately, not discuss other case law that does give (or at least seems to give) a meaning to the term "closest", e.g., by using terminology such as "most promising" springboard (see e.g. [read post]
24 Dec 2008, 11:19 am
The plaintiff does not appear to have sued the anonymous posters who contributed to the allegedly defamatory discourse. [read post]
20 May 2010, 9:27 pm by Keith Bruno
He is accused of kissing Jane Doe #1's face and breasts. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 2:14 pm
Fusting (2016) 1 Cal.App.5th 404, 411; but see People v. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 2:24 pm by Gene Quinn
Still, reporting the results together, the ITC and I agree that: (1) 43-47% of respondents at the ITC in the last 15-18 months are respondents named in NPE/PAE investigations; and (2) 19-28% of investigations at the ITC in the last 15-18 months are NPE/PAE-initiated investigations.... [read post]