Search for: "Does 1-44" Results 81 - 100 of 4,279
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Feb 2024, 7:07 am by Will Daugherty (US)
If the cyber incident does not involve any physical or pollution effects, it could also be reported directly to CISA. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
Artificial intelligence (AI)[1] was the biggest technology news of 2023. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
How does this compare with SEC rulemaking under prior administrations? [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 11:30 pm by Chijioke Okorie
Would these be abolished, or would the government assume this right should it exercise its power under Section 44 of the Constitution? [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 3:30 am by Elspeth Guild
In any event, responsibility does not require a formal agreement between the controllers as regards the purposes and means of processing (para 44). [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 5:00 am by Alden Abbott
The law does not list the pricing of a license as a grounds justifying march-in. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
Furthermore, the Court of Appeal made clear that the caselaw on bare comment does not prescribe an inflexible rule compelling a court to treat a statement of opinion as if it were fact where the opinion implies that a claimant has done something but does not indicate what that something is [24]. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:36 am by Eugene Volokh
Respectfully, we also write to raise serious concerns about the reliability of Professor Lash's writings on Section 3 and to make clear what the historical record does—and does not—say.[1] By answering seven questions, we will show that (1) there was a First Insurrection, (2) John B. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm by Marty Lederman
Cas. at 26.In his opening brief, Donald Trump appeared to preserve this argument, though just barely:  He didn’t devote any space to it.[1]  His reply brief does even less with it than that, offering only the ambiguous sentence “that section 3 may be enforced only though the congressionally enacted methods of enforcement,” without even arguing that Chief Justice Chase got it right in Griffin’s Case. [read post]
  The CNIL, however, is more specific on this point in step 1 of its draft guide. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Similarly, for Kavanagh, the purpose of a “representative democracy” is to create “some ‘deliberative distance’ between the people and their elected representatives so that elected politicians have sufficient opportunity to discern and devise policies in the true interest of the country” (ibid., 44). [read post]