Search for: "Does 1-57"
Results 81 - 100
of 2,989
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Feb 2024, 10:05 am
”[5] Figure 1. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 4:22 pm
Secondly, s.1(1) of the Defamation Act 2013 means that claimants now have to prove that the publication caused, or was likely to cause, serious harm to their reputation. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 10:30 pm
’ On 1 February 2024, Hungary’s Sovereignty Protection Office is going to start operating. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 1:41 pm
On October 1, 2023, Robert F. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
Moab Partners LP,[1] a closely followed case that ought to address whether a purported failure to make a disclosure required under Item 303 of U.S. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 10:30 pm
As Bulgaria is not a member of the Istanbul Convention, recital 17 of the Qualification Directive does not aid qualifying the Convention as ‘relevant’ under Article 78(1) TFEU. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 8:49 pm
The Colorado Supreme Court later held that Colorado Revised Statutes section 1-1-113(1) affords such voters the right to bring such a suit.[1] (Colorado’s constitution doesn’t impose any “standing” limitations, such as those the U.S. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm
See, e.g., America's Constitution: A Biography 170-73, 556-57 (2006); Akhil Amar, America's Unwritten Constitution 17-19, 404 (2012); see also Akhil Amar, The Words That Made Us 472-465 (2021). [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 12:37 pm
It’s not entirely clear which of these two positions Carr and Simington take, but there are some indications that they believe HB20 does trigger intermediate scrutiny. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 6:00 am
"*The Commissioner ruled that Petitioner's appeal must be dismissed and the application denied.The Commissioner noted that an appeal to the Commissioner is appellate in nature and does not provide for investigations and that the Commissioner has no authority to award monetary damages, costs or reimbursements in an appeal pursuant to Education Law §310 , citing Appeal of D.B., 57 Ed Dept Rep, Decision No. 17,244 and Application of Kolbmann, 48 id. 370, Decision No.… [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 6:00 am
"*The Commissioner ruled that Petitioner's appeal must be dismissed and the application denied.The Commissioner noted that an appeal to the Commissioner is appellate in nature and does not provide for investigations and that the Commissioner has no authority to award monetary damages, costs or reimbursements in an appeal pursuant to Education Law §310 , citing Appeal of D.B., 57 Ed Dept Rep, Decision No. 17,244 and Application of Kolbmann, 48 id. 370, Decision No.… [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 7:45 am
The GC replied that “The disclosure of an earlier design within the meaning of Article 7(1) of Regulation No 6/2002 does not, as such, constitute a fact within the meaning of Article 63(1) of Regulation No 6/2002, but the ‘result of a factual assessment’, EUIPO being required to examine all evidence submitted in order to establish whether it actually proves disclosure of the earlier design” (para 87) and that “the disclosure of an earlier… [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 10:30 pm
For example, in some Member States, the complainant does not have the status of a party to the proceedings. [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
What the Commission does instead is arguably worse. [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 7:51 pm
I recently drafted an application with 57 claims. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 4:15 pm
On 1 December 2023, Jay J handed down judgment in Dyson v MGN Ltd [2023] EWHC 3092 (KB). [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 10:59 am
For example, CAS 403 addresses the allocation of home office costs to business segments,[23] and CAS 410 governs the allocation of business unit G&A to final cost objectives.[24] CAS 418, the focus here, applies to the extent any other provision of the CAS does not require a different allocation.[25] The purpose of CAS 418 is to provide criteria for “the consistent determination of direct and indirect costs,” “the accumulation of indirect costs … in indirect… [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 8:53 am
§ 15(e)(1)(B). [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 6:00 am
Appeal of McEvoy is distinguishable, as the petitioner in that appeal alleged that she was required to perform work outside of her tenure area without her consent, which is inherently unlawful (57 Ed Dept Rep, Decision No. 17,198). [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 6:00 am
Appeal of McEvoy is distinguishable, as the petitioner in that appeal alleged that she was required to perform work outside of her tenure area without her consent, which is inherently unlawful (57 Ed Dept Rep, Decision No. 17,198). [read post]
