Search for: "Does 1-72"
Results 81 - 100
of 3,044
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Apr 2009, 9:48 am
The bill does away with the $100,000 limit, lowers the eligible age to 59 1/2, and expands the permissible recipients for those at least 70 1/2 to split interest entities (e.g. charitable remainder trusts). [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 6:01 am
Settlement Planning Issues for DiscussionThe either "72(m)(7) disabled" OR "substantially equal periodic payments" exception afforded to disabled IRA owners and qualified plan distributees appears to apply to holders of modified endowment life insurance contracts (see IRC 72(v)(2)(B)) and 72(v)(2)(C), but DOES NOT appear to apply to holders of annuities.IRC 72(u) imposes a similar 10% penalty tax on withdrawals from… [read post]
5 Mar 2008, 4:46 pm
The Court of Appeal stated that an interpretation of s. 72(1)(f) which would encompass the jointly-owned policy was not consistent with the overall scheme of s. 72 of the SLRA, which was to capture property owned by the deceased. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 12:00 am
The Austrian pub's fate was sealed not by Murphy, but by the absence in the Austrian Copyright Act of a provision similar to Section 72(1) CDPA. [read post]
25 May 2020, 10:00 pm
This Order does not have a termination date. [read post]
24 Dec 2013, 1:44 am
Apparently only these six pictures showed a sufficient degree of creativity (Schöpfungshöhe) and individuality to fall under the comprehensive copyright protection of Article 2 (1) No. 5 German Copyright Act (“photographic works”), the remaining images most likely only falling under Article 72 (protection of photographs). [read post]
31 Jan 2009, 10:09 am
FT is also suing current and/or former employees of Blackstone "who have used the account credentials of another person" as John Does 1 through 100. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 12:40 am
The issues referred are, roughly: (1) should oral proceedings be held to deal with the admissibility of the appeal, (2) does the complainer have standing as appellant and (3) the Haar thing. [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 3:00 am
Recently I purchased an older car for a fun project (‘72 Coupe De Ville if you care to know). [read post]
4 Sep 2009, 3:44 am
Finally, "incrimination" means that my testimony directly ("I murdered John Doe") or indirectly ("I was at John Doe's home the day he was murdered") implicates me in the commission of a crime. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 11:47 am
Law, § 72(1) (Consol. 2011). [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 10:08 pm
That is the case here.BUTAlthough these objective indicia of non-obviousness are relevant to, and must be factored into our analysis, that evidence does not alter the conclusion that, upon consid- eration of all relevant evidence, claims 61–72 of the ’423 patent were invalid as obvious over Sainio in view of Ross. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 7:00 am
Here are three reasons why this is so important.Reason #1: You Protect Your HealthAn important reason to obtain prompt medical care is to protect your health. [read post]
10 Jun 2009, 7:30 am
And most crucially, the plaintiff was 1 to 1 1/2 wheel lengths behind the cyclist in front of her. [read post]
10 Jun 2009, 7:30 am
And most crucially, the plaintiff was 1 to 1 1/2 wheel lengths behind the cyclist in front of her. [read post]
10 Jun 2009, 7:30 am
And most crucially, the plaintiff was 1 to 1 1/2 wheel lengths behind the cyclist in front of her. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 4:31 pm
The only attack could therefore be on substantive grounds (section 74(3) and 72 of the Patents Act 1977 and Articles 52-57 EPC). [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 10:57 am
Ron Engineering, [1981] 1 SCR 111 and M.J.B. [read post]
22 May 2014, 8:44 am
But, on proper interpretation, the claim does not go further than this. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 4:20 pm
What does that leave at the felony level? [read post]
