Search for: "Ganesh Sitaraman"
Results 81 - 100
of 117
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Apr 2017, 7:00 am
Ganesh Sitaraman examined the national security consequences of deregulation. [read post]
13 Oct 2017, 10:22 am
Ganesh Sitaraman and Ingrid Wuerth argued that “national security deference” should not influence federal courts to concede to the government in litigation over the travel ban. [read post]
23 Aug 2018, 6:22 am
Part III examines the influence on constitutional democracy of such global forces as climate change (Robert Percival), religious fundamentalism (Ran Hirschl and Ayelet Shachar), terrorism (Oren Gross), economic inequality (Ganesh Sitaraman), globalization (David Schneiderman), immigration (T. [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 1:24 pm
Without making any direct comparisons, this approach is reminiscent of what Ganesh Sitaraman and Ingrid Wuerth recently described as a process of “normalization” of U.S. foreign relations law, whereby the U.S. [read post]
24 Mar 2018, 4:43 am
Timothy Meyer and Ganesh Sitaraman argued that the president can begin a trade war without the consent of Congress because free trade advocates built the system that way. [read post]
30 May 2015, 6:54 am
Ganesh Sitaraman and David Zionts introduced the role that behavioral psychology plays in decisions about war. [read post]
22 Oct 2017, 1:58 pm
Sitaraman and Wuerth are absolutely right about national security exceptionalism. [read post]
30 Jan 2020, 9:05 pm
In a recent article for the Administrative Law Review, Ganesh Sitaraman of Vanderbilt Law School and Ariel Dobkin of WilmerHale argued that single-director agencies enjoy distinct advantages over multi-member commissions, including improved efficiency and clearer lines of accountability. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 6:16 am
Although somewhat less clear, the decision also tends to undercut the claim (made most notably by Ganesh Sitaraman and Ingrid Wuerth in a recent article in the Harvard Law Review) that the Supreme Court is “normalizing” foreign relations law – that is, treating it the same way that it treats ordinary issues of domestic law. [read post]
6 May 2019, 7:30 am
Daniel Epps and Ganesh Sitaraman have outlined this proposal in a forthcoming Yale Law Journal piece. [read post]
5 Jan 2024, 9:05 pm
In an article for the Michigan Law Review, Timothy Meyer of Duke Law School and Ganesh Sitaraman of Vanderbilt Law School argue that the major questions doctrine will undermine the President’s ability to levy economic sanctions when exercising foreign affairs powers. [read post]
25 Oct 2019, 7:59 am
Louis School of Law and Ganesh Sitaraman of Vanderbilt Law School. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 12:01 pm
The New York Times reports that the deadliest chemical weapons attack in years in Syria killed dozens of people in the northern province of Idlib this morning. [read post]
31 Dec 2015, 5:08 am
War would be easier if an enemy agreed to stand still. [read post]
6 Apr 2018, 12:00 pm
As Tim Meyer and Ganesh Sitaraman wrote on Lawfare, the scope of the president’s authority in these matters is broad. [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 2:50 pm
Amy KapczynskiIn April, Jack Balkin, Yochai Benkler and I convened a workshop on the law and political economy of technology at Yale Law School. [read post]
16 May 2015, 6:55 am
Ingrid Weurth and Ganesh Sitaraman pointed us to their new article in the Harvard Law Review, “The Normalization of Foreign Relations Law. [read post]
19 Nov 2020, 6:00 am
(June 26, 2020, 6:30 AM), https://www.nationalreview.com/2020/06/justice-gorsuch-title-vii-cases-half-way-textualism-surprises-disappoints [https://perma.cc/3CDJ-Z7VE] (suggesting that "discriminat[ion] against" in Title VII must involve "bias or prejudice" against women or men, rather than against gay, lesbian, or transgender individuals); Second, in Ganesh Sitaraman's article on Seila Law. [read post]
9 Apr 2021, 9:53 pm
I expected Dan Epps and Ganesh Sitaraman to be on this committee. [read post]
29 May 2015, 11:23 am
Ganesh Sitaraman and David Zionts pointed us to their new NYU Law Review article on the lessons that behavioral psychology has for constitutional debates on war powers. [read post]