Search for: "Garland v. Downes" Results 81 - 100 of 311
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Dec 2016, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Indeed, it has happened before.In the 1992 case of Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 11:53 am by Wells C. Bennett
Circuit’s Guantanamo detention saga: Suleiman v. [read post]
18 Aug 2016, 7:00 am by Amy Howe
Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia would have loved to take on the case of Armstrong v. [read post]
23 Nov 2016, 4:38 am by Edith Roberts
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit; the lawyer “has not been demanding a specific outcome on the Garland nomination, but he is seeking an up-or-down vote in the post-election Senate session. [read post]
23 Nov 2022, 10:51 am by William Appleton
Department of State’s Nov. 17 filing in Cengiz et al v. bin Salman et al stating that the department recognizes Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman’s sovereign immunity as a sitting head of state. [read post]
4 Dec 2010, 8:00 am by Kent Scheidegger
  The simplest solution would have been to decide that this statute was not really different from the mandatory ones struck down down in Woodson. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 6:51 am by Erin Miller
” At Balkinization, Rick Pildes predicts that, if the Court strikes down the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (Free Enterprise Fund v. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 6:00 am by Quinta Jurecic
Jeanne Shaheen, among others, similarly cited the oath in their comments on Garland. [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 11:25 am by Joseph Fishkin
And it was a very important moment for American democracy and for equal protection of the laws when Democrats voted down Robert Bork’s nomination as too extreme for the Court. [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 3:53 am by Edith Roberts
Harris and Bethune-Hill v. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 5:57 am by Adam Chandler
The Court issued one decision yesterday, in United Student Aid Funds v. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 12:57 pm by Steve Hall
In 1972, the Supreme Court had struck down all existing capital punishment laws in one of the most far-reaching opinions in its history, called Furman v. [read post]