Search for: "Gold Stop LLC" Results 81 - 100 of 130
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Feb 2016, 3:59 am by SHG
At absolute minimum, he would draw his weapon at the approaching bat-wielder and order him to stop. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 4:40 am by Ron Coleman
Assuming state registrations continue to do the trick (and are similarly acted on by eBay, Google, and other providers), they can be an attractive option for a trademark owner if its goal is to stop online infringement. [read post]
25 Aug 2013, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
http://t.co/EYdgU2SxJS -> Patent troll backs down, agrees to stop suing public transit agencies http://t.co/GvoHAUpx6M -> Tyler Perry, Lionsgate Win Dismissal of ‘Good Deeds’ Copyright Case http://t.co/loGXXA3Un4 -> Zappos Gets Zapped. [read post]
18 Sep 2010, 3:34 am by SHG
  If they win.Copyright © 2010 Simple Justice NY LLC. [read post]
30 May 2012, 6:20 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  One former marketing executive, for example, testified that Hyundai designed “a brown basketball as you'd expect with some gold emblems on it to represent luxury definitely laddering and borrowing equity from Louis Vuitton. [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
(IP finance) Gospel, gold diggers and gum trees: How sampling litigation changes the tune (IP Osgoode)   Australia A mere collocation - Full Federal Court allows appeal against grant of interlocutory injunction preventing Smith & Nephew entering negative pressure wound therapy market: Smith & Nephew P/L v Wake Forest University Health Sciences (ipwars.com) The Vegemite/iSnack trade mark saga down under: Fiasco or triumph? [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
(IP finance) Gospel, gold diggers and gum trees: How sampling litigation changes the tune (IP Osgoode) Australia A mere collocation - Full Federal Court allows appeal against grant of interlocutory injunction preventing Smith & Nephew entering negative pressure wound therapy market: Smith & Nephew P/L v Wake Forest University Health Sciences (ipwars.com) The Vegemite/iSnack trade mark saga down under: Fiasco or triumph? [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
LLC v Garmin Int’l, Inc (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) District Court E D Texas: Motion for summary judgment as to patent defendant’s defences and counterclaims granted in p [read post]
15 Mar 2008, 7:00 am
India: Gene silencing: (Spicy IP), India: US Patent reform implications for Indian Pharma: (Spicy IP), India: Generic pharmaceutical industry in the spotlight: (International Law Office), India: Supreme Court refuses to stay a Gujarat High Court decision restraining Ranbaxy from airing its controversial ads directed against Paras Pharma's 'Moov' brand: (Spicy IP),India: Patents on ARV drugs could increase costs: (Generic Pharmaceuticals & IP),US: Survey shows most Americans… [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 9:52 am by Eric Goldman
Both parties see political gold in attacking the Internet. [read post]
3 May 2010, 9:30 pm by admin
The agreement will stop runoff problems into lakes and streams at nearly 600 construction sites in 18 states. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 4:55 am by Marie Louise
Global Global – General Fail to recognize IP (no. 4 in our list of IP mistakes) (IP Think Tank) World Intellectual Property Day – 26 April 2011 – Designing the Future (WIPO) Monopoly lawyers shouldn’t write monopoly laws (TorrentFreak) Industry lobbyist is ‘journalist’ for Managing IP (IP Watch) Intangible assets: how a smartly made small move can set much bigger things in motion… (Business IP and Intangible Assets Report and Blog) Databases galore: Patent… [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 6:42 am by Jim Sedor
Supreme Court’s Citizens United decision, the practices of disclosure have become even cloudier, and mysterious LLC groups have proliferated. [read post]
3 May 2012, 5:00 am by Bexis
  The PLAC presentation also indicated that predictive coding had been approved in the case of Kleen Products LLC et al v. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 6:08 am by Adam Klasfeld
Jurors saw a copy of AMI’s signed contract with Cohen’s company Resolution Consultants LLC, which was not executed following Pecker’s conversation with his attorney. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 11:33 am by Patent Arcade Staff
Mercexchange LLC, 547 U.S. 388, 126 S.Ct. 1837 (SCOTUS 2006): Established test for granting injunctive relief in patent cases. [read post]