Search for: "In Re: Brandon v." Results 81 - 100 of 181
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Mar 2016, 7:38 am by Rory Little
Justice Kagan pointed out that in a prior case (United States v. $8,850, a 1983 forfeiture case), the Court had ruled that “we’re going to do a due process analysis, but we’re going to take the [Speedy Trial Clause] Barker factors as our test. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 2:59 pm by Gritsforbreakfast
They're not very good at policing their own, Mark Bennett's on-point blog screeds notwithstanding. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 12:25 pm by John Elwood
Or sixths, if we’re talking about Friedman v. [read post]
28 Nov 2015, 3:57 am by SHG
The Times editors lack remedial powers, though you might suspect they’re unaware of that fact. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 11:43 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Brandon don't want the DA to be blamed because police kept something secret. [read post]
10 Sep 2015, 4:46 am by Betty Lupinacci
” The title itself comes from the case Joel v. [read post]
13 Aug 2015, 8:02 am
“New Orleans Prosecutorial Disclosure in Practice after Connick v. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 6:21 am by Brandon M. Thompson
The Florida Third District Court of Appeal recently granted rehearing en banc in Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas v. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 2:00 pm
This federal lawsuit alleges that the data downloaded by Defendants from Angie's List was subject to a membership agreement, which was a condition of membership and wherein members agreed not to "reproduce, duplicate, copy, sell, re-sell or exploit" any of the data. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
  The Eighth Circuit Historical Society has an online video commemorating Gideon v. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 2:19 am by INFORRM
On 17 April 2015, the Crown Prosecution Service issued a statement concerning its re-review of Operation Elveden cases. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 4:30 am by Betty Lupinacci
United States, 333 US 46 (1948), the United States Supreme Court ruled that res ipsa loquitur applied in Jesionowski v. [read post]
17 Mar 2015, 8:21 am
But the publishers also appear to be angling for “a second bite at the apple,” says Brandon Butler, practitioner in residence at the American University Washington College of Law, telling PW that re-opening the record would essentially mean "a whole new trial. [read post]