Search for: "In Re: Designation of Judges" Results 81 - 100 of 9,735
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 May 2024, 10:00 am by Ortiz Law Firm
In this post, we’ll examine some common trick questions you might encounter and offer strategies for dealing with them effectively so that you’re well-prepared for the trick questions the SSA judge might ask during your hearing. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 3:31 am
I once heard a TTAB judge opine that the outcome of most Section  2(d) likelihood of confusion cases may be predicted just by looking at the marks and the identified goods/services, without more. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 11:36 am
From Rumpole:TO: Reemberto Diaz; Robin Faber; All JudgesIn RE: Unsolicited emails. 1. [read post]
18 Aug 2014, 2:34 am
In re Forshaw, Serial No. 85797042 (August 15, 2014) [not precedential]. [read post]
11 Nov 2022, 9:37 am by Seeger Weiss
Seeger Weiss is proud to announce founder Chris Seeger has been appointed to serve as co-lead counsel in the In Re: Social Media Adolescent Addiction/Personal Injury Products Liability Litigation by the honorable Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 11:40 am by Bill Raftery
Some states, such as Michigan and Wisconsin, allow for a judge running for re-election to have the designation “incumbent” after their name. [read post]
15 Aug 2008, 9:58 am
Judge Jacobs, writing for the panel (which included Judge Cabranes and District Court Judge Vitaliano, sitting by designation), summarized the holding, as follows:We conclude that the [Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act] protects the appellees - most obviously, the Kingdom itself. [read post]
2 Oct 2017, 3:31 am
In re Khalid Akil White DBA BLKMPWR, Serial No. 86644303 (September 29, 2017) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Linda A. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 7:22 am by Pilar G. Kraman
Mar. 30, 2012), Judge Bumb, sitting by designation, denied defendant Renesas motion to transfer to the Northern District of California distinguishing the Federal Circuit's decision in In re Link A Media. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 3:13 am
I once heard a TTAB judge state that the outcomes of most Section 2(d) likelihood of confusion cases can be predicted just by looking at the marks and the identified goods/services, without more. [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 4:21 am
In re Innova Agri Bio Park Limited, Serial No. 88489477 (July 7, 2022) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Cindy B. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 2:20 am by John L. Welch
Applicant Greenfield Records sought to register the mark AUDIOTURD & Design for musical recordings, but the Examining Attorney issued a Section 2(a) refusal, maintaining that the mark is scandalous and therefore unregistrable. [read post]
5 Jan 2023, 10:00 am by Jo Dale Carothers
Chief Judge Connolly in Delaware says they do, and in In re Nimitz, the Federal Circuit denied a request to stop the judge’s inquiry. [read post]
8 May 2024, 11:49 am by Eric Goldman
We’re waiting to see how the appellate courts handle these issues before drawing any stronger conclusions about whether or not the product design workaround represents the end of Section 230. [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 11:28 pm
The opinion, written by Judge Moore and joined by Judge Newman and District Court Judge Joseph Farnan of the District of Delaware, sitting by designation, reads in its entirety as follows:In light of our decision in In re Bilski, 545 F.3d 943 (Fed. [read post]
19 Nov 2018, 4:17 am
[Answer in first comment].In re Hibernia Distillers Limited, Serial No. 86523391 (October 1, 2018) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Cindy B. [read post]
27 Aug 2017, 2:25 pm by Thomas G. Heintzman
Supreme Court reversed the decision of the Court of Appeal and re-instated the decision of the trial judge. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 2:17 am by John L. Welch
In re Greater Anchorage, Inc., Serial No. 77561929 (February 14, 2011) [not precedential].Specimen of Use: Because color was claimed as a feature of the mark, Applicant was required to submit a specimen showing use of the colors. [read post]