Search for: "Interface, Inc."
Results 81 - 100
of 1,082
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 May 2021, 7:33 am
Publications, Inc., March 10, 2021, per curiam). [read post]
7 Apr 2021, 10:08 am
Oracle America, Inc. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 9:14 am
Ex Parte Baxter International, Inc., No. 2009-006493 (18 March 2010) (informative opinion)Baxter and Fresenius engaged in a hard-fought battle over patents relating to hemodialysis machines with touch screen user/machine interfaces. [read post]
2 May 2021, 1:14 pm
Oracle America, Inc., owns a copyright in Java SE, a computer platform that uses the popular Java computer programming language. [read post]
25 Oct 2014, 9:01 pm
., Inc. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2013, 11:08 am
Ameranth, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 5:57 pm
Patent 8,014,540 entitled "Remote Control Interface For Replacement Vehicle Stereos." [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 3:02 pm
California - Lenovo Inc., Barnes & Noble Inc., Amazon.com Inc. and other makers of tablet products were hit with new infringement allegations on Friday at the hands of Hopewell Culture & Design LLC, which accuses the tablet makers of misappropriating its patented technology for double-clicking an interactive display. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 3:02 pm
California - Lenovo Inc., Barnes & Noble Inc., Amazon.com Inc. and other makers of tablet products were hit with new infringement allegations on Friday at the hands of Hopewell Culture & Design LLC, which accuses the tablet makers of misappropriating its patented technology for double-clicking an interactive display. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 5:11 am
Plumtree Software, Inc. where the Federal Circuit found the term "aesthetically pleasing" to be indefinite because the patentee "offered no objective definition identifying a standard for determining when a interface screen is aesthetically pleasing." [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 5:30 am
CQG, Inc., January 18, 2017, Newman, P.). [read post]
21 Dec 2018, 6:40 pm
USA, Inc. v.Sandoz, Inc., 135 S. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 2:58 am
In re eCopy, Inc., Serial No. 77682275 (April 15, 2011) [not precedential].Applicant argued that its evidence "establishes that the mark is not merely descriptive," but the Board pointed out that Applicant applied under Section 2(f) and did not argue inherent distinctiveness during prosecution. [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 10:44 am
VSL Pharmaceuticals, Inc., No. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 11:33 pm
Accolade, Inc., 977 F.2d 1510, 1522 (9th Cir. 1992); see also Sony Computer Ent’mt, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Apr 2017, 1:39 pm
Uber Techs., Inc., 2017 U.S. [read post]
10 Feb 2016, 12:07 pm
Siebert, Inc., 512 F.3d 1338,1342 (Fed. [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 3:34 am
Zimmerman Associates, Inc. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 10:25 am
(1) Whether copyright protection extends to software code and the organizational structure of a programming language; and (2) Whether, as the jury found, the petitioner’s use of a software interface in the context of creating a new computer program constitutes fair use. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 11:10 am
The initial suit targeted American consumer tech giant Apple Inc. [read post]