Search for: "J. Collins" Results 81 - 100 of 1,185
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jul 2023, 4:35 pm by INFORRM
On the same day, Fancourt J heard two applications in Duke of Sussex v NGN. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 4:07 am by INFORRM
On 29 June 2023,  Collins Rice J granted an injunction in the case of WFZ v BBC [2023] EWHC 1618 (KB) restraining publication by the BBC of a report in a form which identified the claimant as the subject of active criminal proceedings. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 9:52 am by INFORRM
On 29 June 2023,  Collins Rice J granted an injunction in the case of WFZ v BBC [2023] EWHC 1618 (KB) restraining publication by the BBC of a report in a form which identified the claimant as the subject of active criminal proceedings. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 1:07 am by INFORRM
On 19 June 2023 Collins Rice J heard the second day of the application in the case of WFZ v BBC. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 10:01 am by Eugene Volokh
My students Pareesa Darafshi, Gerardo Valentino Gorospe IV, and Philip Raucci and I just submitted this brief on behalf of the Academic Freedom Alliance in Pernell & Novoa v. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 2:00 am by INFORRM
On Wednesday 14 June 2023 there was a hearing in the case of WFZ v BBC before Collins Rice J. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 12:53 am by INFORRM
Last week in the courts On 6 to 9 June 2023, the trial in the case of LCG v OVD continued before Collins Rice J. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal Prosecutors Scrutinize Political Nonprofit Groups for Fund-Raising Fraud DNyuz – David Fahrenthold, William Rashbaum, and Tiff Fehr (New York Times) | Published: 6/1/2023 Federal prosecutors are scrutinizing at least 10 political nonprofit groups seeking to determine if the organizations defrauded donors, according to subpoenas. [read post]
Panel Discussion | Being Mindful of Gendered Language in the Workplace Panelists: Sheree Haggan (She/Her), Global Diversity Strategist & Professional Speaker; Larry Nelson-Guillen (He/Him/His), Human Resources Professional and Diversity, Equity & Inclusion Practitioner; and Darci J. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
George Wright, Free Speech and Antisemitism: Collin v. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 1:21 am by INFORRM
The Mirror Group phone hacking trial will continue on 6 June 2023 before Fancourt J. [read post]
29 May 2023, 9:03 am by INFORRM
On the same days, Collins Rice J heard the trial in the case of LCG v OVD QB-2022-000921. [read post]
23 May 2023, 12:58 am by INFORRM
Last week in the courts On 15 May 2023, Nicklin J continued to hear the trial of MBR Acres Ltd v Free MBR Beagles. [read post]
9 May 2023, 8:33 am by elimwong
LAW LIBRARY level 3: HV551.5.C3 I58 2022 Chris J. [read post]
8 May 2023, 12:22 am by INFORRM
On 2 May 2023 Collins Rice J heard a case management hearing in the case of Nagi v Santhiramoulesan. [read post]
3 May 2023, 2:27 pm
 FEATURESThe Fight for LibrariesLibraries and higher education face a shared battle.By Emily DrabinskiCritical Information Literacy for Collective ActionLibrary workers have a crucial role in the contemporary information environment.By Reanna EsmailHow Academic Freedom Brought Our Librarian Union TogetherCollective bargaining is a powerful tool for securing workplace rights for librarians.By Martin J. [read post]
1 May 2023, 7:46 am by INFORRM
On the same day, Linden J heard the trial of a preliminary issue in the libel case of Evans v McMahon and Kerr J heard an appeal in the case of Samuels v Laycock. [read post]
30 Apr 2023, 3:10 pm by Maria Hook
This seems to be the view adopted by Dicey, Morris and Collins on the Conflict of Laws (16th ed, at [12-093]). [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 11:31 am by admin
Back in 2011, at a Fourth Circuit Judicial Conference, Chief Justice John Roberts took a cheap shot at law professors and law reviews when he intoned: “Pick up a copy of any law review that you see, and the first article is likely to be, you know, the influence of Immanuel Kant on evidentiary approaches in 18th Century Bulgaria, or something, which I’m sure was of great interest to the academic that wrote it, but isn’t of much help to the bar. [read post]