Search for: "JOHNSON v. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH" Results 81 - 100 of 524
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jul 2021, 7:11 pm by Vercammen Law
In seeking illumination, we look to the legislation concerning residential health care facilities, rooming and boarding houses, dementia care homes, and nursing homes.As early as 1953, the Legislature granted the Department of Health or the Department of Community Affairs, "as appropriate," N.J.S.A. 30:11A-1, licensing and regulatory authority over the State's "residential health care facilities," N.J.S.A. 30:11A-3. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 6:51 am by tracey
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Faith Stewart v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2011] EWCA Civ 907 (29 July 2011) Suckrajh, R (on the application of) v The Asylum & Immigration Tribunal & Anor [2011] EWCA Civ 938 (29 July 2011) Iqbal v Ahmed [2011] EWCA Civ 900 (29 July 2011) Hayes v Merseyside Police [2011] EWCA Civ 911 (29 July 2011) Austin & Ors v Miller Argent (South Wales) Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 928 (29 July 2011) Modi & Anor… [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 10:01 pm by Cookson Beecher
Last year, the Washington State Department of Health received 76 reports of V. parahaemolyticus-related illness. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 3:27 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board, heard 22 and 23 July 2014. [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 4:41 am by Michael Caruso
”But people accused in federal court obtained the right to counsel twenty-five years earlier in Johnson v. [read post]
1 Jun 2020, 3:40 am by Edith Roberts
” At the ImmigrationProf Blog, Kevin Johnson and others weigh in on Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 2:10 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
Hotak v London Borough of Southwark; Johnson v Solihull; and Kanu v London Borough of Southwark, heard on 15 December 2014. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 1:20 pm by Unknown
Johnson (Criminal Jurisdiction; Tribal Court) United States v. [read post]
6 Aug 2020, 12:40 pm by Matt Gluck
In the latest development in the Trump v. [read post]
12 Nov 2023, 4:00 am by Administrator
This interpretation has not “evolved” or “changed” in a way that departs from any previous meaning held by s. 648(1). [read post]