Search for: "James C. Strong"
Results 81 - 100
of 724
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Sep 2022, 12:30 am
James Welland [2011] Worcester Const. [read post]
14 Aug 2022, 6:02 am
Precisely who is the subject of these investigations and how strong the evidence is at this stage remains unclear. [read post]
4 Aug 2022, 6:30 am
This post was prepared for a roundtable on Wrestling with Religious Diversity, convened as part of LevinsonFest 2022—a year-long series gathering scholars from diverse disciplines and viewpoints to reflect on Sandy Levinson’s influential work in constitutional law. [read post]
26 Jul 2022, 6:01 am
.''"] From Friday's decision by Judge James Boasberg in Kartte v. [read post]
25 Jul 2022, 1:54 am
Canada Last week the Supreme Court delivered a strong affirmation on the importance of copyright balance and the role of technological neutrality, confirming that “[c]opyright law does not exist solely for the benefit of authors,” SOCAN v Entertainment Software Association. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 2:15 pm
" David C. [read post]
29 Jun 2022, 11:28 am
Shockingly, the court says 1-800 Contacts has an inherently distinctive mark (suggestive) that’s strong. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 7:13 am
James, W. [read post]
22 Jun 2022, 6:47 am
Pfander and Peter C. [read post]
21 Jun 2022, 11:30 am
In a landmark paper, economist David Popp found high energy prices have a strong impact on innovations in energy-efficient technology.[4] On paper, carbon taxes look fantastic, but they do have a few challenges in practice. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 9:05 pm
[Editor’s Note: This post is based on a comment letter submitted to the U.S. [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 6:30 am
” But one explanation for populism, obviously, is a justified belief that governmental institutions have been captured by elites who fit James Madison’s notion of a “faction,” i.e., representatives of distinctly partial interests rather than people genuinely committed to something that might be termed “the public interest. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 1:01 am
On June 13, 1967, President Johnson nominated Marshall to the Supreme Court following the retirement of Justice Tom C. [read post]
11 Jun 2022, 1:41 pm
Pix Credit Beijing ReviewI take this opportunity to post for comment a discussion draft recently completed. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 10:32 am
There is actually a disquietingly strong case at this point that Trump should be disqualified under Section 3 as a factual matter. [read post]
5 Jun 2022, 8:39 am
And the lone dissenting judge in the Fifth Circuit ruling, James C. [read post]
31 May 2022, 6:43 am
A lot has been written of late about the privacy (or otherwise) of family money cases, and all of it by men with big brains and a lot of words. [read post]
30 May 2022, 1:00 am
The objector suggested an alternative position, which was agreed by the Parish; consequently, the Petition was effectively unopposed, and the D A C having considered the matter in detail, supported the proposals and recommend that the Faculty be granted as it was presently sought [6]. [read post]
2 May 2022, 6:30 pm
§ 812(c)(10). [read post]
13 Apr 2022, 12:43 pm
He had a strong sense of American exceptionalism. [read post]