Search for: "James R. Wilson" Results 81 - 100 of 643
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Nov 2020, 1:45 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Adopting Wilson LJ’s reasoning in R (LG) v Independent Appeal Panel for Tom Hood School [2010] EWCA Civ 142 Lady Arden holds that the Rules could prescribe standard of proof. [read post]
23 Oct 2020, 9:05 pm by Peter Jacobs
First Amendment questions about restricting schematics for 3D-printed guns can be avoided by using copyright law, R Street Institute’s Charles Duan argues in Lawfare. [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 11:08 am by Eric Goldman
Eric Goldman, Santa Clara University School of Law Catherine R. [read post]
5 Aug 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
For the Symposium on Mark Tushnet, Taking Back the Constitution: Activist Judges and the Next Age of American Law (Yale University Press 2020).Amanda Hollis-BruskyTaking Back the Constitution is an ambitious book that covers a wide swath of territory in its attempt to explain, critique and offer alternatives to the contemporary Supreme Court and its constitutional agenda. [read post]
2 Aug 2020, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
”Following Mill, Woodrow Wilson, then a professor at Princeton University, argued that in the constitutional scheme, Congress’s ability to provide what he called “vigilant oversight of administration” was just as important as its legislative power.The Supreme Court generally has agreed with Wilson’s view. [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 6:05 am by Michael Geist
Senator James Cowan, who was the lead proponent of the legislation, joins me on the podcast to discuss what prompted him to take on the  issue and the unlikely path of Canada’s genetic non-discrimination law. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 9:05 pm by Max Masuda-Farkas
Kelling and James Q. [read post]
31 May 2020, 4:22 pm by INFORRM
  There was a post on the Brett Wilson media law blog. [read post]
2 May 2020, 1:07 pm by Josh Blackman
[Further thoughts on the Tucker Act and Federal Question Jurisdiction] Last week I posed a question: "can a plaintiff seek compensation for an unconstitutional taking, without relying on the Tucker Act's jurisdiction–if not under the Takings Clause, perhaps under some theory of tort. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 12:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
This precedent was broken by President Woodrow Wilson when he asked Thomas R. [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 4:16 pm by David Kopel
[Third Circuit case challenges NJ magazine confiscation statute] Did the Framers of the Second Amendment consider the possibility that Americans might own firearms with a capacity greater than 10 rounds? [read post]