Search for: "K v C" Results 81 - 100 of 3,099
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Nov 2023, 9:41 pm by Kurt R. Karst
The PR goes on to state that the FD&C Act definition of a device does not turn on where or by whom a test system is “manufactured. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 6:26 am
       (c)  The responsible development and use of AI require a commitment to supporting American workers. [read post]
27 Oct 2023, 6:02 am by Bill Marler
Sources, Characteristics, and Identification E. coli is an archetypal commensal bacterial species that lives in mammalian intestines. [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 9:24 am by Silverberg Zalantis LLC
K-Tooling https://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2023/2023_05349.htm the Court found, omitting the owner of the property at issue from the initial petition in the Article 78 challenge to the use variance could be cured through the relation back doctrine in CPLR 203 (C). [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 1:23 am by Roel van Woudenberg
Yesterday, a Press Communiqué was published as the Enlarged Board had issued its decision in consolidated cases G 1/22 and G 2/22 and the decision became available in the register, and today on the Recent Decisions page. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 7:41 am by Norman L. Eisen
Expand all Collapse all Relevant Court Proceedings United States v. [read post]
1 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
Should the award fair value be subtracted under Item 402(v)(2)(iii)(C)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K because it failed to vest in the current year? [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 6:37 am
In September 2022, Cubans overwhelmingly approved a referendum on adoption of a new family law (Código de las  Familias). [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 3:30 am by David Lynn
Question 128D.17 – The fair value of an award that did not meet vesting conditions during the year because the performance or market conditions were not met, but for which there is still potential for the award to vest in the future, should not be subtracted under Item 402(v)(2)(iii)(C)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K because it failed to vest in the current year. [read post]
25 Sep 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
., CFTC No. 23-42, at 4–5, (Sept. 7, 2023). 3 Opyn, at 5–6; Deridex, at 5–6. 4 See Order, CFTC v. [read post]