Search for: "Law v. Colvin" Results 81 - 100 of 195
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Nov 2016, 8:24 pm by Sme
Colvin (10th Cir., October 21, 2016) (affirming denial of disability benefits and supplemental income because the ALJ properly addressed Razo's impairments and the opinions of the treating physician and the vocational expert)*Shelton v. [read post]
9 Jul 2016, 12:53 pm by Sme
Workers Compensation/Occupational Safety and Disease *Lykins v. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 12:00 pm by Sme
Colvin (10th Cir., February 23, 2016) (affirming denial of benefits)*Cases marked with an asterisk are cases the 10th Circuit does not consider binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. [read post]
28 Oct 2015, 12:00 am by Sme
Colvin (10th Cir., October 15, 2015) (affirming finding of no disability)*Gabriel v. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 11:32 pm by Sme
Colvin (10th Cir., August 18) (affirming denial of disability benefits)*Cases marked with an asterisk are cases the 10th Circuit does not consider binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 10:05 pm by Sme
Colvin (10th Cir., October 11, 2016)(affirming denial of disability benefits because Kirkpatrick failed to show that his RFC is unsupported by substantial evidence)*Elhelbawy v. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 5:28 pm by Sme
Colvin (10th Cir., February 2, 2017) (affirming denial of disability insurance and supplemental security benefits: Covington failed to show she was disabled)*Rael v. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 11:44 am
Yet this is the standard that is so often applied by the Social Security Administration and the Administrative Law Judge, who is responsible for reviewing the claim if it's rejected and then appealed. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 8:42 pm by Sme
Colvin (10th Cir., December 21, 2015) (reversing denialof Supplemental Security Income benefits because ALJ failed to properlyconsider treating physician’s opinion)Simmons v. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 9:15 pm by Sme
Colvin (10th Cir., March 7, 2016) (affirming denial of disability benefits based upon the medical and psychological reports)*Cases marked with an asterisk are cases the 10th Circuit does not consider binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 9:22 pm by Sme
Global Staffing (10th Cir., June 17, 2015) (affirming judgement as a matter of law and jury verdict against Smith on his Title VII, civil rights, and ADA claims)Levy v. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 9:48 pm by Sme
Colvin (10th Cir., May 26, 2016) (reversing denial of disability benefits because the administrative law judge improperly ignored a relevant medical opinion without justification)Workplace Violence/Weapons*Kerkhoff v. [read post]
27 Jul 2016, 9:23 pm by Sme
Colvin (10th Cir., July 20, 2016) (affirming denial ofreview of ALJ determination that Ray was not impaired, as Ray failed to showany basis for reversal)*Cases marked with an asterisk are cases the 10th Circuit does not consider binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 7:08 pm by Sme
Colvin (10th Cir., August 3, 2015) (affirming denial of disability insurance benefits)Workers CompensationMartinez v. [read post]