Search for: "M/V ADVANTAGE"
Results 81 - 100
of 2,347
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm
The Securities and Exchange Commission regulations on climate disclosure, first proposed in March 2022 and likely to be issued in final form in October 2023,[1] have drawn considerable controversy and face an uncertain fate in the inevitable litigation.[2] Much less attention has gone to two bills that are moving toward adoption in California. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 5:49 am
Doe precedents or Doe v. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 11:14 am
In Brown v. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 8:20 am
In Hurley v. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 7:13 am
Elkin-Koren: Google already has an enormous advantage over newcomers; making everyone who enters pay a levy would kill competition forever. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 7:18 am
So maybe I’m not blind after all. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 6:57 am
My apologies, but I’m extremely jetlagged and will not attribute well or capture a lot of nuance. [read post]
10th Circuit endorses presumption of Lanham Act false advertising injury in mostly two-player market
29 Jun 2023, 5:15 am
Vitamins Online, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 2:31 pm
By Lisa M. [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 5:55 pm
(I’m unaware of any prior cases dealing with this issue.) [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 4:41 pm
There's an FTC v. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 10:01 am
The Act thus cannot be justified by Bishop v. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 6:30 am
It was famously rejected in McCulloch v. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 4:52 am
”[21] What is striking about this case is that the defendant’s indictment was not based on the typical insider trading statutes involving securities law violations but instead the general wire fraud statute.[22] While this case contains facts and methods usually seen in stock-related insider trading cases, it differs from traditional insider trading prosecutions in crucial ways.[23] This strategy by the DOJ provides prosecutors with a key advantage in digital asset cases. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 4:52 pm
Before us in the present is a 49-page document docketed as 23-cr-80101 in the Southern District of Florida, conspicuously captioned: United States of America v. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 8:36 am
It posits both a firm with a first-mover advantage and the presence of significant scale economies for the potential entrant. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 8:36 am
It posits both a firm with a first-mover advantage and the presence of significant scale economies for the potential entrant. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 10:02 am
"); R.A.V. v. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 8:54 pm
Professor Rademacher read law in Düsseldorf and Oxford and obtained a PhD in Münster. [read post]
3 Jun 2023, 6:30 am
But the language of the opinions was often much loftier, as when the Court said, in Wolff v. [read post]
